This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of "MAYA", a mobile cognitive behavioral therapy app for anxiety and mood disorders, in adults who have had a stroke.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of "MAYA", a mobile CBT application, in adults who have had a stroke. Feasibility will be measured by the total number of sessions completed and acceptability will be measured by scores on the Mobile Application Rating Scale-User Version (uMARS). Qualitative feedback will also be collected with a questionnaire using open-ended questions. A secondary objective will be to evaluate preliminary efficacy of the mobile CBT application on symptoms of depression and anxiety assessed using (1) interview-based measures (the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale \[MADRS\] and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale \[HAM-A\]), and (2) a patient reported outcome measure (the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale \[DASS\]). This study will collect pilot data over the course of 8 weeks. Because this is a pilot study, all participants will use the same version of the app and there will be no control group. Primary outcome measures will be collected at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the endpoint (week 8). Participants will be asked to use the mobile app for at least two days a week, for 30 minutes on each day, for 8 weeks. Participants will have weekly check-ins in person or via a HIPAA compliant virtual meeting platform (Zoom) with a study staff member to assess intervention adherence and answer brief questionnaires designed to assess feasibility, acceptability, and mood symptoms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
10
A mobile cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) app called "Maya" that includes modules with educational content and teaching and practice of strategies that address depression and anxiety after stroke.
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, United States
RECRUITINGFeasibility and Acceptability of MAYA as measured by the Mobile Application Rating Scale-User Version (uMARS)
Feasibility and acceptability will be measured by the scores collected on the uMARS by assessing the sub scores of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information of the app to measure the perceived quality of the app. The outcome is the mean of the individual items, ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 denoting minimal satisfaction/rating of app quality and 5 denoting maximum satisfaction and highest rating of app quality.
Time frame: Week 4 of treatment
Feasibility and Acceptability of MAYA as measured by the Mobile Application Rating Scale-User Version (uMARS)
Feasibility and acceptability will be measured by the scores collected on the uMARS by assessing the sub scores of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information of the app to measure the perceived quality of the app. The outcome is the mean of the individual items, ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 denoting minimal satisfaction/rating of app quality and 5 denoting maximum satisfaction and highest rating of app quality.
Time frame: Week 8 of treatment
Number of Sessions completed over study time period
To assess the feasibility of "MAYA" in adults who have had a stroke, by assessing the number of sessions completed.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 8 (8 week treatment)
Qualitative Interview
This is a series of questions with open-ended responses that are designed to ask participants about their experience using the app and completing the CBT program. There is no numerical scoring; responses are evaluated qualitatively to explore engagement with the app.
Time frame: Week 8 of treatment
Change in depression symptoms, as measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in score on the MADRS, a clinician-rated assessment of depression symptom severity that consists of 10 items; each item is rated on a 0-6 scale, resulting in a maximum total score of 60 points, with higher scores indicative of greater depression symptom severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment (8 week treatment)
Change in anxiety symptoms, as measured by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)
Change in score on the HAM-A, a clinician-rated assessment of anxiety symptom severity that consists of 14 items; each item is rated on a 0-4 scale, resulting in a maximum total score of 56 points, with higher scores indicative of greater anxiety symptom severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment (8 week treatment)
Change in depression, anxiety, and stress, as measured by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS)
Change in score on the DASS, a patient-reported symptom measure of depression, anxiety, and stress symptom severity that consists of 21 items; each item is rated on a 0-3 scale, resulting in a maximum total score of 63 points, with higher scores indicative of greater depression, anxiety, and/or stress symptom severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 of treatment (8 week treatment)