This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who exhibit suboptimal early response to antidepressant treatment. Additionally, it sought to investigate the impact of FMT on biological indicators, including intestinal microbiota and metabolites, in individuals with MDD
This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of adjunctive FMT in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who show limited response to initial drug therapy. A total of 600 patients experiencing depressive episodes will be screened, with all receiving escitalopram oxalate for an initial 2-week period. Of these, 214 participants who exhibit suboptimal therapeutic response to early antidepressant treatment will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental group or control group. During the intervention, participants will continue their existing antidepressant regimen and receive a 4-week treatment with either microbiota capsules or placebo. An additional 20-week follow-up assessment will then be conducted to evaluate outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
214
The experimental group will maintain escitalopram treatment and take 1.0 g of FMT capsules orally with breakfast every day for 4 weeks.
Both the experimental group and the placebo group were treated with the maximum tolerated dose of escitalopram.
The placebo group will maintain escitalopram treatment and take corn starch capsules 1.0 g orally with breakfast every day for 4 weeks.
Wuhu Fourth People's Hospital
Wuhu, Anhui, China
RECRUITINGBeijing Anding Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGThe differences in efficacy(HAMD-17 score reduction rate ≥50%) between the two groups
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17(HAMD-17) was used to assess the severity of depression in patients. If the HAMD-17 score reduction rate was ≥50%, the treatment was considered effective. 4 weeks after 4-week treatments, the differences in the effective rate of treatment between the two groups will be compared.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
The differences in complete remission rate(HAMD-17 ≤ 7 points) between the two groups
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAMD-17) was used to assess the severity of depression in patients. 4 weeks after 4-week treatments, the differences in complete remission rate (HAMD-17 ≤ 7 points) between the two groups will be compared.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
The differences in effective rate(HAMD-17 score reduction rate ≥50%)
At the end of 4-week treatments, the differences in effective rate(HAMD-17 score reduction rate ≥ 50%) between the two groups will be compared.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
The differences in complete remission rate(HAMD-17 ≤ 7 points) between the two groups
At the end of 4-week treatments, the differences in complete remission rate(HAMD-17 ≤ 7 points) between the two groups will be compared.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Changes in total score of GAD-7 scale
Changes in the total score of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7) scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes in total score of QIDS-SR scale
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Nangfang Hospital Affiliated of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
RECRUITINGShandong Daizhuang Hospital
Jining, Shandong, China
RECRUITINGWest China Hospital Affiliated of Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
RECRUITINGTianjin Anding Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
RECRUITINGThe Second People's Hospital of Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture
Dali, Yunnan, China
RECRUITINGThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
RECRUITINGQuick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Rated(QIDS-SR) is mainly used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. It includes 9 symptoms for depression diagnosis. QIDS-SR is very sensitive to changes in depressive symptoms. Changes in the total score of QIDS-SR scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
The differences in the reduction scores of the HAMD-17 scale in 4 symptom dimensions
The differences in the reduction scores of the HAMD-17 scale in 4 different symptom dimensions at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) was recorded: depression (1/2/3/7/8 items), anxiety (9/10/11/15/17 items), insomnia (4/5/6 items), and somatic (12/13/14/16 items).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes in total score of GSRS scale
The investigators will use the 7-level rating version of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale(GSRS). Changes in the total score of the GSRS scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes in total score of SF-12 scale
Changes in the total score of the Short Form 12 Health Survey(SF-12) scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes in total score of SDS scale
Changes in the total score of the Sheehan Disability Scale(SDS) scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes in total score of PDQ-5D scale
Changes in the total score of the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire for Depression 5-item(PDQ-5D) scale at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes of each subscale of CBCT
Changes of each subscale of the Cognitive Behavioral Assessment Tool(CBCT) at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes of each subscale of CGI
Changes of each subscale of the Clinical Global Impressions(CGI) at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-weeks treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes of each subscale of PSQI
Changes of each subscale of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI) at each follow-up time (0,4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Changes in brain imaging and EEG indicators
Changes in brain imaging and Electroencephalogram(EEG) indicators at each follow-up time (4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments) will be compared with the total score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Evaluation of the safety of the treatments
The investigators will record any adverse events reported by participants, after treatments at each follow-up time (4,8 and 20 weeks after 4-week treatments).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24