The vast majority of serious clinical situations leading to intensive care (septic shock, polytrauma, acute cerebral aggression, major surgery) are characterized by significant systemic inflammation. Recently, the existence of a common immune response pattern to acute aggression has been demonstrated, and with it the existence of a phenomenon known as post-aggressive immunosuppression (PAIS).
The vast majority of serious clinical situations leading to intensive care (septic shock, polytrauma, acute cerebral aggression, major surgery) are characterized by significant systemic inflammation. Recently, the existence of a common immune response pattern to acute aggression has been demonstrated, and with it the existence of a phenomenon known as post-aggressive immunosuppression (PAIS). This immunological adaptation, initially implemented as a host defense mechanism to protect against an overwhelming systemic reaction, can, if prolonged, lead to multiple complications resulting in significant delayed morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is based on the use of immuno-inflammatory biomarkers, the most widely studied of which is monocyte expression of major histocompatibility complex type II molecules (mHLA-DR). We have recently confirmed that PAIS can affect all types of patients admitted to the intensive care unit, but mainly occurs in the most severe patients. We also showed that the occurrence of PAIS was strongly associated with the subsequent occurrence of secondary infection and excess mortality. Currently, there is no treatment with proven efficacy for PAIS, but several drugs have been shown to restore leukocyte function in-vitro. Several teams have reported the use of immunostimulatory molecules in patients with treatment failure, with a good safety profile and encouraging results. We believe that earlier treatment of patients with proven PAIS could improve their clinical outcome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
170
interferon gamma-1b 2 X 106 IU, injectable solution. Subcutaneous injection every 24 hours for 3 consecutive days (3 total injections)
Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive saline injectable solution. Subcutaneous injection every 24 hours for 3 consecutive days (3 total injections)
Dr de Roquetaillade
Paris, France
RECRUITINGPr Dépret
Paris, France
RECRUITINGnumber of days alive without mechanical ventilation
number of days alive without mechanical ventilation on day 28 after randomization or on discharge from intensive care if this occurs before the 28th day
Time frame: on Day 28 after drug administration
Evaluate the efficacy of IFNy in correcting PAIS-defining biological abnormalities (re-ascension of mHLA-DR above 8,000 AB/C) between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Evolution of mHLA-DR measured at Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 28 or at discharge from intensive care if earlier (Day 0 corresponding to the day of inclusion in the study) between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 7 and at Day 28 post randomization
Evaluate, depending on the randomization arm, the kinetics of plasma inflammatory parameters between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Evolution of inflammation markers (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, TNFa, etc.) measured in plasma at Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7, or at discharge from intensive care if it occurs before (Day 0 corresponding to the day of inclusion in the study) between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time frame: Day 0, Day 3 and at Day 7 post randomization
mortality at Day 28 and Day 90 after randomization
Mortality rate at Day 28 and Day 90 after randomization between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time frame: Day 28 and Day 90 after randomization
incidence of nosocomial infections during intensive care unit stay
The incidence of nosocomial infections during an ICU stay between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time frame: from Day 0 to Day 28 (or the discharge from intensive care)
number of days alive whithout antibiotic
Number of days alive without antibiotic assessed on day 28 after randomization between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time frame: Day 28 after drug administration
length of stay in intensive care between patients
Number of days in intensive care between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time frame: from Day 0 to Day 28 (or the discharge from intensive care)
- Compare organ failure score (SOFA) kinetics between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Kinetics of SOFA score assessed at inclusion and during the 7 days following inclusion between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time frame: From inclusion to Day 7
Evaluate, depending on the randomization arm, the transcriptomic profile of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells count between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Evolution of the transcriptomic profile of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using scRNAseq analysis measured at Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7 or upon discharge from intensive care if this occurs earlier.
Time frame: Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7 after randomization
Evaluate, depending on the randomization arm the leucocyte count between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Evolution and kenetics of the leucocyte count measured at Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 28 or at discharge from intensive care if earlier (Day 0 corresponding to the day of inclusion in the study) between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 7 and at Day 28 post randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.