This historical cohort study aims to evaluate the impact of different intensity rehabilitation protocols on the short and medium-term severity of non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's Disease. One of the principal strengths of this study is that it is a real-life study, so it has a high external validity necessary to test the clinical effectiveness of these two types of training, which could have significant practical implications for rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
48
In High Intensive Training patients received 1800 minutes of training globally. In our practice, a single outpatient session varies from 60 to 90 minutes, the number of sessions per cycle from 10 to 20, and the frequency from 2 days a week to 5 days a week. Irrespective of total course intensity, each session comprises at least 15 minutes of aerobic training (over ground or treadmill) and 10 minutes of flexibility and strengthening exercise. No less than 10 minutes of balance training, 10 minutes of overground training in dual tasks, and 15 minutes of occupational therapy are additionally delivered. The duration of the single training components in each session may increase according to the patients' functioning profiles, requesting a more intensive practice of gait, balance or trunk alignment or a focused training of arm dexterity or basic ADL.
In Low Intensive Training patients received less than 900 minutes of training globally. In our practice, a single outpatient session varies from 60 to 90 minutes, the number of sessions per cycle from 10 to 20, and the frequency from 2 days a week to 5 days a week. Irrespective of total course intensity, each session comprises at least 15 minutes of aerobic training (over ground or treadmill) and 10 minutes of flexibility and strengthening exercise. No less than 10 minutes of balance training, 10 minutes of overground training in dual tasks, and 15 minutes of occupational therapy are additionally delivered. The duration of the single training components in each session may increase according to the patients' functioning profiles, requesting a more intensive practice of gait, balance or trunk alignment or a focused training of arm dexterity or basic ADL.
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Politecnica delle Marche University,
Ancona, AN, Italy
Changes in Non-motor Symptoms
The changes in non-motor symptoms mesaured by the Non Motor Symptoms Scale ( NMSS; score range: 0-360; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: before treatment, immediately after treatment, and six months following the end of the treatment
Changes in Non-motor Symptoms
The changes in non-motor symptoms mesaured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part I ( UPDRS part I; score range 0-52; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: before treatment, immediately after treatment, and six months following the end of the treatment
Changes in Parkinson's Disease related disability
The Parkinson's Disease related disability measured by the the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II (UPDRS Part II; score range 0-52; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: before treatment, immediately after treatment, and six months following the end of the treatment
Changes in motor symptoms severity
Changes in motor symptoms severity measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS Part III; score range 0-128; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: before treatment, immediately after treatment, and six months following the end of the treatment
Changes in the severity of the Freezing of Gait
The changes in Severity of the Freezing of Gait mesaured by the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ; score range 0-24; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: before treatment, immediately after treatment, and six months following the end of the treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.