Dental implants are worldwide recognized one of the best manners to replace lost or hopeless prognosis teeth. There are different variables that creates proper conditions for long-term prognosis of implant treatments. Implant position and surrounding bone around them, have been described in scientific literature to be key factors in the longevity of those treatments. It has to be defined the \"critical bone thickness\" around implants. It basically means that implants has to be completely surrounded by bone, that will serve as protection. If the implants are not surrounded by bone, procedures as guided bone regeneration may be performed. Those procedures can be executed before or simultaneously during the implant placement. In the standard procedure, the simultaneous guided bone regeneration during implant placement requires to leave the implant and the regeneration healing below the gingiva, needing a second surgery for accesing to those implants. In this randomized controlled trial the hypothesis is to discover if not submerging this regenerations may show the same results than submerged ones. For that, the objective is to study the different variables around these regeneration to evaluate the performance of non-submerged protocol.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
32
Guided Bone Regeneration by means of bone xenograft and collagen membrane (submerged approach)
Guided Bone Regeneration by means of bone xenograft and collagen membrane (Non submerged Approach)
Uic Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
Vertical bone dimensional changes
Comparison between CBCT images. Vertical bone changes in mm from initial CBCT to 12 months CBCT will be asessed.
Time frame: 0-12months
Horizontal bone dimensional changes
Comparison between CBCT images
Time frame: 0-12 months
Buccal Bone thickness (Dehiscence resolution)
Comparison between CBCT images
Time frame: 0-12 months
Marginal Bone Loss (MBL)
Comparison between 2d xrays
Time frame: 0-12 months
Peri-implant clinical parameters
Clinical variables
Time frame: 0-12 months
Volumetric parameters
Comparison between STL's models
Time frame: 0-12 months
PROMs
Patient Related Outcomes. (Overall satisfaction from 1-10, Pain perceived from 1-10, Willingness to repeat in case of need from 1-10)
Time frame: 0-12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.