Hypnotherapy for Oral Lichen Planus. Patients with Clinically and Histologically Confirmed Oral Lichen Planus Would Be Randomized for Hypnotherapy Vs Psychoeducation About the Pyschoneuroimmune System. Follow Up Would Be Done At 2, 6, 12 Weeks After.

Overview

60 patients with clinically and histologically confirmed Oral Lichen Planus, which are are typically followed up at our oral mucosal disease clinic with a standing diagnosis for at least 1 year would be randomized. 30 would undergo a session of psychoeducation and hyponotherapy and 30 would undergo psychoeducation alone. This would be done by the PI who is an oral medicine specialist and licensed for medical hypnosis. Patients would be instructed to practice self hypnosis and would be followed up by their original oral medicine specialists who would be blinded to the intervention the had recieved - follow up would be done at 2, 6, and 12 week intervals. Patients would be asked to fill 3 standardized questionnaires (translated to Hebrew and verified): PHQ-9, OHIP-14, ERQ . The clinical appearance of their lichen planus would be documented using a standardized semi-quantitive method as described by Piboonniyom et al, OOOO 2005

Background: Lichen planus (LP) is an immune-mediated skin and mucous membrane disease that mainly affects middle-aged adults of both sexes with a slight tendency to women. The precise prevalence of LP is unknown, but it is estimated that the oral form (OLP) alone is expressed in about 1-2% of the population. OLP is a chronic disease and it is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a pre-malignant condition. OLP presents in five clinical forms - reticular, plaque-like, erythematous/atrophic, erosive/ulcerative and bullous. The reticular form is the most common and is characterized by white papules and/or white mesh-like stripes called Wickham's striae, typically bilaterally and symmetrically distributed. The most affected site is the posterior buccal mucosa followed by the tongue, gingiva and labial mucosa.2 Usually, this condition is asymptomatic even if it is diffuse, but the erythematous, erosive and ulcerative forms might cause a painful burning sensation. In 1978 the WHO published diagnostic criteria for OLP based on clinical and histopathological characteristics and in 2003 van der Meij and van der Waal modified these criteria, which are accepted till this day. Despite a vast number of studies, the etiology of OLP remains unknown. It is believed that OLP is a result of a local cell-mediated immune response, involving antigen-presenting cells and inflammatory infiltrate predominantly of T lymphocytes, but its precipitating factors have not been determined. Some conditions have been associated with OLP, including among others, genetic predisposition, specific microorganisms, several systemic health conditions, and emotional disorders. The latter have been thoroughly investigated and some studies have showed that OLP patients, especially those with the erythematous/erosive forms, have higher state of anxiety and depression than non-OLP individuals. It has been suggested that psychological factors can alter the functionality of the immune system, leading to the development of autoimmune diseases. To date, no study has conclusively demonstrated a cause-and-effect relationship and more investigations about the possible correlation of anxiety and emotions with the severity of OLP are needed. Hypnosis is a natural human phenomenon and every human tends to have trance like events several times a day. Techniques for induction and deepening of the hypnotic trance can be utilized in order to maintain this state and access aspects of psyche and physiology that are not readily accessible in the ordinary waking state. Ample literature is available on the use of hypnosis for treatment of medical conditions that are exacerbated by emotions such as autoimmune and autoinflammatory conditions. That being said there are only anecdotal reports of hypnotherapy being used for Lichen Planus of the skin and non for OLP. Study design: Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of OLP for at least 1 year prior to participation and examined by Dr. Zlotogorski (AZ) or Dr. Whitefield (SW) would be offered to participate and would give signed consent. Willing patients' presentation and behavior of OLP would be documented in a Clinical Research File (CRF) and clinically photographed. CRF would include frequency of need for topical/systemic steroids, retinoids, calcineurin inhibitors and a semiquantitive scoring system for monitoring oral lichenoid lesions (from Piboonniyom et al, OOOO 2005). Questionnaires would be filled out. All Patients would be given Hebrew versions standardized and validated questionnaires: Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). At this point patients would be referred to Dr. Wasserman (GW) who is an oral medicine specialist and licensed to practice medical hypnosis as well as for research related to hypnosis by the hypnosis advisory committee to the ministry of health. GW would conduct a test of hypnotisability using a pendulum and "magnetic fingers". Patients who rank with low hypnotisability would be added to the control group. Patients who rank well would be randomized into 2 groups: 1. Psychoeducation group 2. Psychoeducation and hypnosis group Randomization would be done by flipping a coin. GW would administer a brief presentation of psychoeducation and the relevance of the psycho-neuro-immuno-endocrine system to OLP. Patients randomized for hypnosis would also receive an explanation about hypnosis. This is to establish rapport between GW and each patient. All patients would be instructed not to mention the contents of the session with GW to AZ or to SW. For patients selected for hypnosis, a short interview would be conducted about themselves including hobbies, favorite practices and places, fears or dislikes, daily stressors and triggers, effect of OLP on their lives - this is to tailor metaphors and suggestions for each participant and to strengthen rapport. Hypnosis would include: * Induction. * Hypnotic relaxation and escalating deepening of hypnotic trance. * Suggestions for healing and wellness of the oral mucosa and for balanced and optimal performance of the immune system, tailoring metaphors and images based on interview with patients. "…the interior of the mouth is soft, healthy pink, intact and whole. It functions optimally as it should - enabling joyful eating and tasting, speaking with ease for any needed expression, any function of the mouth that needs to be used can be done so easily. The immune system is very wise - it knows perfectly how to function in a balanced and harmonious way. Its wisdom enables it to act if the body needs defense and to standby and rest if it does not". * Ego strengthening. * Anchoring - using a predetermined mark selected by the patient. * Dehypnotisation. After dehypnotisation patients would be guided through rapid trance induction by themselves using the anchor created while in trance. In case of an abreaction during trance, patients would be excluded from the trial and referred to a psychologist. At the end of the session patients would be instructed to practice self-hypnosis at least once a day and set a reminder on their phone. Patients selected for hypnosis would receive a weekly phone call to "nudge" the daily practice and also to record that number of times they practiced. The session would be documented under an "Oral Medicine - Research" admission and under "Research - confidential" on the hospital's electronic medical record platform. Two weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after the session with GW, patients would be clinically reassessed by AZ or SW. They would receive a phone call or a text message as reminder not to mention the contents of their session with GW in order to secure the blinding. On a day of follow up, questionnaires would be filled out, and AZ or SW would conduct a thorough clinical examination, enter data into the CRF and conduct photographic documentation. As control 30 age matched OLP patients who meet the inclusion criteria but were not offered to participate or even told of the study would be analyzed retrospectively according to the medical record - all patients in the Oral Mucosal clinic would be documented using the same semiquantitive scoring system and NRS. Data collected from these patients would include demographic information as well as their semiquantitive score which is always recorded for OLP patients. Data would be accessed from the "Chameleon" platform. The data will be retrospectively collected and anonymously stored using a connecting list between the research code and the participants' details. Each participant will be given a number and the data will be typed into an electronic spreadsheet after all the identifying details have been deleted. The connecting list will be kept in a locked closet of the PI, or in a password-protected computer at the hospital. The list will be destroyed once the data processing is complete. A note regarding that will be made at the report regarding the end of the research. The separation of the identifying data will be made only by the PI or sub-PI, who is from the hospital's staff, with authorization to access medical files. The file will not be sent by a non-encrypted e-mail and will be taken out of the hospital without signing a contract with the R\&D division. The data will be stored in an anonymous file for a period of 7 years after the termination of the study. The file will be password-protedcted on the departmental server. Data analysis Data will be analyzed using SPSS 28 (IBM). T-test would be used for continuous variables, ANOVA test would be used to test variability between groups, Chi square for nominal variables and correlation tests between groups. Statistical significance is defined as p\<0.05.