The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if ASP-1929 photoimmunotherapy (PIT) in combination with pembrolizumab works to treat recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC) with no distant metastases. It will also learn about the safety of ASP-1929 PIT in combination with pembrolizumab. Researchers will compare ASP-1929 PIT in combination with pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (carboplatin or cisplatin, plus 5-fluorouracil or paclitaxel or docetaxel) according to physician's choice (control arm). The overall primary study hypothesis being tested is whether ASP-1929 PIT plus pembrolizumab combination treatment improves the overall survival (OS) of the population defined by the inclusion/exclusion criteria over the control arm.
This is a phase 3 multicenter, randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASP-1929 photoimmunotherapy (PIT) in combination with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab-based standard of care (SOC) as first-line treatment of locoregional recurrent HNSCC in patients with no distant metastases. Patients will be enrolled into the study starting with 3 treatment arms, ASP-1929 PIT at doses of 320 mg/m\^2 or 640 mg/m\^2 in combination with pembrolizumab treatment arms or a SOC treatment arm in which patients may receive pembrolizumab alone or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy according to physician's choice. Treatment assignment within the SOC treatment arm will be based on the decision of the site investigator. To ensure that the SOC treatment arm is appropriately balanced, a 50% enrollment cap will be imposed on pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, so that approximately the same number of patients will have been treated within each category. At the start of the study all patients will be randomized 2:2:1 ratio to ASP-1929 PIT 320 mg/m\^2 plus pembrolizumab versus ASP-1929 PIT 640 mg/m\^2 plus pembrolizumab versus SOC (pembrolizumab alone or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy according to physician's choice). An interim analysis (IA) will be conducted for this study as part of the dose optimization process. Patient enrollment will continue during the period of preparation and conduct of this IA. Based on the findings from the first interim analysis (IA1), the Sponsor will have the option to close one of the two ASP-1929 PIT treatment arms for enrollment. The final decision on the optimized ASP-1929 PIT dose for this study will be made in agreement with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
412
ASP-1929 IV infusion followed by illumination with light dose of 50 J/cm\^2 for superficial lesions and 100 J/cm for interstitial lesions within 24 +/- 4 hours after the end of ASP-1929 infusion (up to 24 months)
200 mg Q3W or 400 mg Q6W, IV infusion over 30 minutes (up to 24 months)
Area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL/min IV infusion, Q3W up to 6 cycles
100 mg/m\^2 IV infusion, Q3W up to 6 cycles
1000 mg/m\^2 per day from Days 1-4 of each cycle, IV infusion, Q3W up to 6 cycles
100 mg/m\^2 IV infusion given on Days 1 and 8, Q3W up to 6 cycles or 175 mg/m\^2 IV infusion given on Day 1, Q3W up to 6 cycles
75 mg/m\^2 IV Infusion, Q3W up to 6 cycles
City of Hope
Duarte, California, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGTampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Kentucky Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
WITHDRAWNThomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGRhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
RECRUITINGAvera Cancer Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
RECRUITINGAichi Cancer Center
Aichi, Japan
RECRUITINGHiroshima University Hospital
Hiroshima, Japan
RECRUITING...and 12 more locations
Overall survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
Complete response rate (CRR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by central reviewer
CRR is defined as the proportion of patients with best overall response of confirmed CR
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
Overall response rate (ORR) per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by central reviewer
ORR is defined as the proportion of patients with best overall response of confirmed CR or confirmed partial response (PR)
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
Progression-free survival (PFS) per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by central reviewer
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months
OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months are defined as the proportions of patients who are alive at these time points
Time frame: 12, 18, and 24 months
Duration of Response (DOR) per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by central reviewer
DOR is defined as the time from first response (CR or PR) that is subsequently confirmed to the time of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
Duration of CR per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by central reviewer
Duration of CR is defined as the time from first response (CR) that is subsequently confirmed to the time of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
Time to response (TTR)
TTR is defined as the time from randomization to the first confirmed response (CR or PR)
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
CRR from randomization to End of Treatment as assessed by the central reviewer
CRR (confirmed response) from randomization to end of treatment is defined as the proportion of patients with the best overall response of CR, where the CR occurs anytime during the study treatment period (e.g., CR after Progressive Disease \[PD\] will be counted).
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Proportion of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0
TEAEs refer to any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of any study treatment through 30 days after the last dose of study treatment and any additional immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that begin between 30 days and 90 days after the last dose of anti-PD1 treatment. In addition, any serious AE with an onset date more than 30 days after the last dose of study treatment assessed by the investigator as related to study treatment will be considered a TEAE.
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
Proportion of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) by CTCAE v5.0
Any TEAE (defined in Outcome 10) for which there is a reasonable possibility that the investigational treatment caused the adverse event.
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
Proportion of serious adverse events (SAEs) by CTCAE v5.0
An AE or suspected adverse reaction is considered 'serious' if, in the view of either the Investigator or Sponsor, it meets one or more of the following criteria (21 CFR 312.32 (a)): Results in death, Is life-threatening, Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or Important medical event.
Time frame: Up to approximately 48 months
Quality of Life assessment: EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Each scale or item score is standardized to a range of 0 to 100. Higher scores on the functional scales reflect better functioning, whereas higher scores on the symptom scales indicate more severe symptoms or greater levels of distress. Similarly, higher scores on the global health status scale denote better overall health and quality of life. Thus, an optimal quality of life profile is characterized by high scores on the functional and global health status scales, combined with low scores on the symptom scales. The summed scores of Functional scales, Symptom scales, and Global health status domains of EORTC-QLQ-C30 are compared between treatment arms.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
Quality of Life assessment: EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35)
EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire developed to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales that assess pain, swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact and sexuality. Each scale or item score is standardized to a range of 0 to 100. Lower score on each scale represents fewer symptoms and less impact on the patient's daily life. The summed scores of the scales of EORTC-QLQ-H\&N35 are compared between treatment arms.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
Population pharmacokinetics (PK) - Clearance (Experimental Arm Only)
A structural compartment model with population factors such as age, race, ECOG, and sex will be utilized to analyze concentration levels. The clearance estimates associated with different factors will be reported.
Time frame: Before the start of 1st ASP-1929 infusion, 0.25 hours, 4 hours, 24 hours, 192 hours, 360 hours after end of 1st infusion; same timepoints for 2nd ASP-1929 infusion
Presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) (Experimental Arm Only)
Average concentration level of ADAs at baseline and 15 days after ASP-1929 infusion for the first 2 treatments.
Time frame: Before the start of 1st ASP-1929 infusion, 15 days after end of 1st infusion; same timepoints for 2nd ASP-1929 infusion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.