The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effect of digitally delivered programs on the health, wellbeing, and functioning of newly diagnosed cancer patients. Participants will be randomized to one of two digital programs. Both groups are equally important for the study. Participants will be asked to complete: * Questionnaires. Answers to the questionnaires will help the investigators understand how participants doing through the study. * Modules. Participants will receive access to digital courses developed by experts at Stanford University. * Blood Samples. At home blood collection kits will help the investigators understand how participants' bodies are responding over time. Kits will be sent and returned by mail.
A cancer diagnosis and its subsequent treatment affects whole patient health -- disrupting the full spectrum of physical, social, emotional, and functional quality of life. An estimated 83% of cancer patients report low to very low quality of life. Individuals receiving chemotherapy report experiencing over 13 concurrent symptoms, including fatigue, sleep difficulties, and pain. 30%-40% of people with cancer report significant psychological symptoms, including anxiety and depression. Such disruptions in mental health and quality of life, in turn, exacerbate physical symptoms and can worsen clinical outcomes. Despite growing evidence of the complex, interconnected pathways linking the mind and body, scalable interventions that efficiently target whole-person health upon diagnosis of a life-altering disease such as cancer have not yet been developed. Existing medical treatments, focus on the physiological aspects of the disease. Existing psychological treatments, such as Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) and Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), apply a broad range of cognitive and behavioral strategies to reduce diffuse symptoms of depression and anxiety. Such ancillary programs for psychological care are routinely proposed as methods to reduce distress and symptoms, restore function, and improve quality of life, but they are frequently inaccessible to patients and notoriously difficult to scale. The MINDSET intervention aims to close this major treatment gap and promote whole patient health by targeting patient mindsets at the point of diagnosis. This proposal builds on our extensive foundational research completed over the past 6 years with support of the NIH New Innovator Award (DP2 AT009511) to test a novel mHealth intervention targeting patient mindsets at the point of diagnosis. In our prior research, we showed that a 2.5-hour digital MINDSET intervention significantly improves whole patient health (physical, social, and emotional functioning as measured by the FACT-G) in patients undergoing systemic treatment for cancer with curative intent compared to a Treatment as Usual (TAU) control. Leveraging our interdisciplinary team of experts in oncology, psychology, psychiatry, mHealth, and biostatistics, we aim to expand on this prior research to address this large and costly gap in clinical care. We propose a fully decentralized Phase 3 randomized controlled trial in which 440 cancer patients treated for non-metastatic solid tumors and hematological malignancies will be allocated to either a (1) MINDSET or (2) Matched Attention Control (MAC) condition. Patient-reported primary outcomes (FACT-G Total Score) and secondary outcomes (anxiety, depression, affect, sleep, coping, symptom distress, patient activation/engagement, and inflammatory biology) will be assessed at weeks 0 (baseline), 2, 4, 6, and 10. Durability of the effect of the intervention will be measured at two follow-up timepoints: 3 months, and 6 months after study completion. By promoting health at the psychological, behavioral, and biological levels, MINDSET interventions have the potential to become a highly impactful and complementary tool for promoting whole patient health.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
440
2.5-hour mHealth intervention consisting of three modules containing brief films and corresponding interactive reflection activities aimed to improves whole patient health (physical, social, emotional, and functional quality of life as measured by the FACT-G) in patients undergoing systemic treatment for cancer with curative intent. Films feature interviews with people living with cancer describing their experience with diagnosis, treatment, and recovery, and the importance of their mindsets during their experience. The films also feature Stanford faculty with expertise in oncology, psychiatry, and psychology who offer a scientific framework for the importance of mindsets during cancer treatment and provide examples from their clinical practices. The reflection exercises that follow the films are designed to help patients craft a personalized strategy (a) for changing maladaptive mindsets and maintaining adaptive ones and (b) for translating ideas from the film into actionable behavior
This behavioral intervention provides educational information on coping strategies for individuals undergoing cancer treatment through a hybrid of videos and corresponding questions.
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
RECRUITINGFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G)
Physical, emotional, social and functional quality of life will be assessed using the FACT-G questionnaire. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of quality of life in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well being. Original development and validation involved 854 patients with cancer and 15 oncology specialists.
Time frame: Treatment Phase: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 2, 4, 6, 10 Follow Up: Months 3, 6
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Anxiety Short Form 8a (PROMIS-A)
Anxiety will be measured using the 8 item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Anxiety Short Form 8a (PROMIS-A). The PROMIS-A measures fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness), and somatic symptoms related to arousal (racing heart,dizziness). The items in the PROMIS negative affect banks use a 7-day time frame and a 5-point rating scale that ranges from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"), with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. The standardized T-Score for cancer patients reference population is 50 and the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in T-scores is 3.0-4.5. Anxiety T-scores can be interpreted categorically as ≤55 = normal; 56-60 = mild; 61-70 = moderate; ≥71 = severe.
Time frame: Treatment Phase: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 2, 4, 6, 10 Follow Up: Months 3, 6
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression Short Form 8b (PROMIS-D)
Depression will be measured using the 8 item the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression Short Form 8b (PROMIS-D). The PROMIS-D content focuses on negative mood (sadness, guilt), views of self (self- criticism, worthlessness), and social cognition (loneliness, interpersonal alienation), as well as decreased positive affect and engagement (loss of interest, meaning, and purpose). The items in the PROMIS negative affect banks use a 7-day time frame and a 5-point rating scale that ranges from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. The standardized T-Score for the cancer patient reference population is 50 and the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in T-scores is 3.0-4.5. Depression T-Scores can be interpreted categorically as ≤55 = normal; 56-60 = mild; 61-70 = moderate; ≥71 = severe.
Time frame: Treatment Phase: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 2, 4, 6, 10 Follow Up: Months 3, 6
Positive and Negative Affect (I-PANAS-SF)
Positive and negative affect will be measured by the International version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Short Form (PANAS-SF). This is a cross-culturally validated version of the widely affect measure that consists of 10 items; 5 items measuring negative affect and 5 items measuring positive affect.
Time frame: Treatment Phase: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 2, 4, 6, 10 Follow Up: Months 3, 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.