The purpose of this study is to evaluate the abilities of Cystatin C (CysC) and CysC-based estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) equations to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles of meropenem and cefepime relative to Serum Creatinine (SCR), Serum Creatinine based Equation (SCRE)and iohexol at the population and individual levels in critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections. We hypothesize that CysC and CysC-based eGFR equations will characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime at the population and individual levels with greater accuracy and precision than SCR and SCREs. Iohexol will be administered to patients enrolled in the study and serve as the reference indicator of measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR), which is the gold standard assessment of kidney function. We hypothesize that the predictive performances of CysC and CysC-based eGFR equations in estimating the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime at the population and individual levels will be comparable to iohexol. The information obtained in this study will be used to develop PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) optimized meropenem and cefepime dosing schemes based on the renal function biomarker population PK (PopPK) model with the best predictive performance for clinical use in the treatment of critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections and varying degrees of renal function. The primary objective of this study is to compare the abilities of renal function biomarkers (CysC, CysC-based eGFR equations, SCR, SCREs) relative to iohexol to characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime in critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections.
The intent of this study is to compare the abilities of Cystatin C (CysC) and CysC-based estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) equations to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles of meropenem and cefepime relative to Serum Creatinine (SCR), Serum Creatinine based Equation (SCRE), and iohexol in critically ill patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections. We hypothesize that CysC and CysC-based eGFR equations will characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime at the population and individual levels with greater accuracy and precision than SCR and SCREs. Iohexol will be administered to patients enrolled in the study and serve as the reference indicator of measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR), which is the gold standard assessment of kidney function. We further hypothesize that the predictive performances of CysC and CysC-based eGFR equations in estimating the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime at the population and individual levels will be comparable to iohexol. Firstly, population PK (PopPK) modeling will be used to develop meropenem and cefepime PopPK models informed by CysC, CysC-based eGFR equations, SCR, and SCREs (renal function biomarkers), and iohexol. Secondly, model diagnostics will then be used to compare the predictive performances of the renal function biomarkers PopPK models for each antibiotic relative to iohexol PopPK model. Lastly, Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) will be used to design PK/ pharmacodynamics (PD) optimized meropenem and cefepime dosing schemes based on the renal function biomarker PopPK model with the best predictive performance for use in the treatment of critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections and varying degrees of renal function. The primary objective of this study is to compare the abilities of renal function biomarkers (CysC, CysC-based eGFR equations, SCR, SCREs) relative to iohexol to characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime in critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections. The secondary objective of this study is to develop PK/PD optimized meropenem and cefepime dosing schemes based on the renal biomarker function PopPK model with the best predictive performance relative to the iohexol PopPK model for critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
Iohexol,N,N´ -Bis(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-5-\[N-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-acetamido\]-2,4,6-triiodoisophthalamide, is a non-ionic, water-soluble radiographic contrast medium with a molecular weight of 821.14 (iodine content 46.36%)
Harbor UCLA Medical Center - Medicine - Infectious Diseases
Torrance, California, United States
RECRUITINGTorrance Memorial Medical Center
Torrance, California, United States
RECRUITINGHenry Ford Health System - Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
RECRUITINGCorewell Health - Infectious Disease
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
RECRUITINGDuke University Hospital - Infectious Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
RECRUITINGEast Carolina University - Infectious Diseases and Tropical/Travel Medicine Clinic
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine - Division of Infectious Diseases
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGOregon Health and Science University - Adult Infectious Diseases Clinic
Portland, Oregon, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Pittsburgh - Medicine - Infectious Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGCarilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
RECRUITINGAkaike's information criterion (AIC) of cefepime
For PopPK models
Time frame: Days 1-2
Akaike's information criterion (AIC) of iohexol
For PopPK models
Time frame: Days 1-2
Akaike's information criterion (AIC) of meropenem
For PopPK models
Time frame: Days 1-2
Clearance (Cl) of cefepime
Time frame: Days 1-2
Clearance (Cl) of iohexol
Time frame: Days 1-2
Clearance (Cl) of meropenem
Time frame: Days 1-2
Intercompartment rate constant of cefepime
Time frame: Days 1-2
Intercompartment rate constant of iohexol
Time frame: Days 1-2
Intercompartment rate constant of meropenem
Time frame: Days 1-2
Objective function value (OFV) of cefepime
For PopPK models
Time frame: Days 1-2
Objective function value (OFV) of iohexol
For PopPK models
Time frame: Days 1-2
Objective function value (OFV) of meropenem
For PopPK models
Time frame: Days 1-2
Volume of distribution (Vd) of cefepime
Time frame: Days 1-2
Volume of distribution (Vd) of iohexol
Time frame: Days 1-2
Volume of distribution (Vd) of meropenem
Time frame: Days 1-2
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) optimized meropenem and cefepime dosing schemes
For PopPK models
Time frame: Days 1-2
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.