Effect of Different Surgical Approaches of Granulomatous Mastitis

Overview

The objective of this study was to prospectively investigate the effects of different surgical approaches on the recurrence rate and aesthetic outcome of patients with granulomatous mastitis. The patients were divided into traditional surgery group and plastic surgery group.

Granulomatous mastitis is a rare benign inflammatory breast disease first described by Kessler and Wollock in 1972. It resembles inflammatory breast cancer disease in imaging and mainly affects women of childbearing age. Treatment methods include steroid therapy, antibiotics and surgical treatment. However, due to the adverse reactions of drug treatment and the high recurrence rate after traditional surgery, there is no definitive preferred treatment form at present, and most clinicians are still in the stage of empirical treatment. Breast-conserving plastic surgery has been widely used by surgeons because it can remove a larger range of breast cancer, so it has higher safety and aesthetics compared with traditional breast conserving surgery. So, if patients with mastitis are treated surgically, will they also benefit from breast-conserving surgery? At present, the commonly used breast conserving plastic surgery includes tennis racket, bat wing, V/J breast plasty, Grisotti and so on. Therefore, this study prospectively grouped mastitis patients who selected surgery, and divided them into traditional surgery group and plastic breast-conserving surgery group. The postoperative recurrence, adverse reactions, aesthetics and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. It is hoped that this study will bring a new research direction for the surgical treatment of mastitis and provide a clearer guiding significance for clinical decision-making.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes

Central Contacts