twenty patients received mandibular overdenture constructed by different construction techniques were classified equally and randomly into two groups peri implant bone loss was assessed by CBCT at baseline (T0), at1 year(T1), at 3 years(T3) and posterior ridge resorption was assessed by CBCT at baseline (T0), at 1 year( T1), at 3 years (T3). By superimposition of pre and post CBCT.
twenty patients received mandibular overdenture constructed by different construction techniques were classified equally and randomly into two groups (n = 10 per group): Group A: received milled mandibular overdenture opposed by maxillary complete denture. Group B: received 3D-printed mandibular overdenture opposed by maxillary acrylic complete denture. peri implant bone loss was assessed by CBCT at baseline (T0), at1 year(T1), at 3 years(T3) and posterior ridge resorption was assessed by CBCT at baseline (T0), at 1 year( T1), at 3 years (T3). By superimposition of pre and post CBCT.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
20
using CBCT, vertical bone loss (VBL) was measured at baseline (T0), at1 year(T1), at 3 years(T3)
posterior ridge resorption was assessed by CBCT at baseline (T0), at 1 year( T1), at 3 years (T3). By superimposition of pre and post CBCT.
Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Egypt
peri implant bone loss
peri implant bone loss was assessed by CBCT
Time frame: at baseline (T0), at1 year(T1), at 3 years(T3)
posterior ridge resorption
posterior ridge resorption was assessed by CBCT at baseline (T0), at 1 year( T1), at 3 years (T3). By superimposition of pre and post CBCT.
Time frame: at baseline (T0), at 1 year( T1), at 3 years (T3).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.