Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, severe and chronic systemic autoimmune disease (AD) characterized by vasculopathy, immune dysregulation and fibrosis leading to multi-organ dysfunction (primarily skin, lungs, heart gastrointestinal tract and kidneys), with high morbidity and mortality, altered health-related quality of life, all at high cost for patients and society. Treatment are mostly symptomatic and only autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has shown long term improvement in overall and event-free survival with disease-modifying properties. However, AHSCT is contra-indicated in case of advanced visceral involvement and in eligible patients, it is still associated with risk of toxicity. There is an urgent need to identify safe and effective treatments for severe SSc. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are multipotent cells which carry immunomodulatory, pro-angiogenic and anti-fibrotic properties, that can target SSc pathogenesis and its clinical manifestations. The increasing use of MSC, harvested from bone marrow (MSC(M)), adipose tissue (MSC(AT)), or umbilical cord (MSC(UC)) in a variety of indications, provides consistent evidence supporting their safety in humans. The efficacy of MSC(M) intravenous (IV) injection for treating acute graft versus host disease led to their marketing approval in 2012 and MSC(AT) (Alofisel) were approved for severe Crohn's fistula in 2018. MSC represent a promising therapeutic approach for SSc. We have previously a) shown disease-specific abnormalities in MSC(M) from SSc patients, providing strong rationale to use allogeneic MSC to treat SSc patients, b) published the first phase I/II dose escalation trial using allogenic MSC(M) infusion in 20 severe SSc patients (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02213705, PHRC AOM 11-250) with no safety issues, significant improvement in skin fibrosis at 3 to 6 months after infusion which appeared lower thereafter, thereby supporting the need for repeated infusions. In vitro, experimental and clinical studies suggest that MSC properties vary according to their tissue of origin/source. We demonstrated that compared to MSC(M), MSC(AT) are easier to harvest and display higher proliferative capability before entering senescence, higher genetic stability, and superior immunosuppressive properties. Considering the above rationale, we hypothesize that use of healthy donors allogeneic MSC(AT) produced by Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) will demonstrate a) no safety issues, b) an efficacy profile that will increase with repeated infusion of allogeneic MSC(AT) to treat SSc.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
18
1 MSC(AT) (2x10\^6 cells/kg) injection at M0 and 1 MSC(AT) (2x10\^6 cells/kg) injection at M3
1 MSC(AT) (2x10\^6 cells/kg) injection at M0 and 1 placebo injection at M3
Placebo at M0 and M3
Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events
Defined as Adverse Events (AE) of grade equal or above 3 using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 classification, at one month after each infusion according to arms (M1, M4) An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3
Time frame: After each infusion
Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3
Time frame: At time of infusion
Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3
Time frame: Within 24 hours of infusion
Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3
Time frame: At 6 months
Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3
Time frame: At 9 months
Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3
Time frame: At 12 months
Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) difference
Main efficacy endpoint is assessed by mRSS difference between M0 and M12 Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a semiquantitative score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe), used to evaluate the skin thickness in 17 different cutaneous sites (for a total score from 0 to 51). The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Time frame: Between Month 0 and month 12
Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS)
Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a semiquantitative score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe), used to evaluate the skin thickness in 17 different cutaneous sites (for a total score from 0 to 51). The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Time frame: At 3 months
Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS)
Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a semiquantitative score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe), used to evaluate the skin thickness in 17 different cutaneous sites (for a total score from 0 to 51). The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Time frame: At 6 months
WHO performance status
Karnofsky performance scale Score varies betwwen 0 and 5. The lower the score, the less the patient's life is affected.
Time frame: At month 0
WHO performance status
Karnofsky performance scale Score varies betwwen 0 and 5. The lower the score, the less the patient's life is affected.
Time frame: At month 3
WHO performance status
Karnofsky performance scale Score varies betwwen 0 and 5. The lower the score, the less the patient's life is affected.
Time frame: At month 6
WHO performance status
Karnofsky performance scale Score varies betwwen 0 and 5. The lower the score, the less the patient's life is affected.
Time frame: At month 12
Scleroderma-Health Assessment Quetionnaire
It determines a disability index (DI), which is calculated as a continuous variable from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability) Steen VA Arthritis et rhumatism 1997 ; 40 : 1984-91
Time frame: At month 0
Scleroderma-Health Assessment Quetionnaire
It determines a disability index (DI), which is calculated as a continuous variable from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability) Steen VA Arthritis et rhumatism 1997 ; 40 : 1984-91
Time frame: At month 3
Scleroderma-Health Assessment Quetionnaire
It determines a disability index (DI), which is calculated as a continuous variable from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability) Steen VA Arthritis et rhumatism 1997 ; 40 : 1984-91
Time frame: At month 6
Scleroderma-Health Assessment Quetionnaire
It determines a disability index (DI), which is calculated as a continuous variable from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability) Steen VA Arthritis et rhumatism 1997 ; 40 : 1984-91
Time frame: At month 12
Short Form (36) health survey (SF36v2)
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.
Time frame: At month 0
Short Form (36) health survey (SF36v2)
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.
Time frame: At month 3
Short Form (36) health survey (SF36v2)
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.
Time frame: At month 6
Short Form (36) health survey (SF36v2)
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.
Time frame: At month 12
EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire
It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life.
Time frame: At month 0
EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire
It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life.
Time frame: At month 3
EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire
It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life.
Time frame: At month 6
EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire
It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life.
Time frame: At month 12
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time frame: At month 0
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time frame: At month 3
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time frame: At month 6
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time frame: At month 12
Diffusing capacity of Lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO)
Time frame: At month 0
Diffusing capacity of Lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO)
Time frame: At month 3
Diffusing capacity of Lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO)
Time frame: At month 6
Diffusing capacity of Lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO)
Time frame: At month 12
Response to treatment
Defined as any of the following: decreased mRss \> 25%, increased FVC \> 10% and/or increased DLCO \>10%, without need for further immunosuppression except low dose steroids (below 10mg daily)
Time frame: At month 3
Response to treatment
Defined as any of the following: decreased mRss \> 25%, increased FVC \> 10% and/or increased DLCO \>10%, without need for further immunosuppression except low dose steroids (below 10mg daily)
Time frame: At month 6
Response to treatment
Defined as any of the following: decreased mRss \> 25%, increased FVC \> 10% and/or increased DLCO \>10%, without need for further immunosuppression except low dose steroids (below 10mg daily)
Time frame: At month 12
Progression Free Survival
Defined as the percentage of enrolled patients still alive without evidence of progression 12 months after MSC(AT) injection, with progression defined as any of the following compared to baseline evaluation: decreased FVC \> 10% or DLCO \> 15%; decrease in LVEF% \> 15%; decrease in weight \> 15%; decrease in creatinine clearance \> 30%; increased mRss \> 25% ; and/or increase in SHAQ\> 0.5
Time frame: At month 12
Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS)
GRCS is based on several outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure , renal failure , or cardiac failure . The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline.
Time frame: At month 3
Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS)
GRCS is based on several outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure , renal failure , or cardiac failure . The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline.
Time frame: At month 6
Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS)
GRCS is based on several outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure , renal failure , or cardiac failure . The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline.
Time frame: At month 12
Composite response index in dcSSc (CRISS)
For early SSc patients only It is a weighted score and includes five measures: modified Rodnan skin score, FVC% predicted, HAQ-DI, patient and clinician global assessments. CRISS score is a probability from 0 to 1 that represents the likelihood of a patient achieving overall improvement. The higher the score, the greater the improvement
Time frame: At month 3
Composite response index in dcSSc (CRISS)
For early SSc patients only It is a weighted score and includes five measures: modified Rodnan skin score, FVC% predicted, HAQ-DI, patient and clinician global assessments. CRISS score is a probability from 0 to 1 that represents the likelihood of a patient achieving overall improvement. The higher the score, the greater the improvement.
Time frame: At month 6
Composite response index in dcSSc (CRISS)
For early SSc patients only
Time frame: At month 12
Overall survival
For early SSc patients only It is a weighted score and includes five measures: modified Rodnan skin score, FVC% predicted, HAQ-DI, patient and clinician global assessments. CRISS score is a probability from 0 to 1 that represents the likelihood of a patient achieving overall improvement. The higher the score, the greater the improvement
Time frame: At month 12
Impact of allogeneic MSC(AT) infusion on the immune response
Impact of allogeneic MSC(AT) iv once or twice at 3 months interval on the immune response, including immunophenotyping and alloimmunization up to M6 after starting therapy
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Cost effectiveness of the allogeneic MSC(AT) infusion
Once or twice versus no treatment in severe SSc
Time frame: At month 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.