This study hopes to explore whether the changes in rumination exhibited in behavioral experiments mediates the effects of mindfulness intervention on alleviating emotional distress
In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have seen extensive application in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Studies show that mindfulness training improves emotional regulation and processing, contributing to better emotional health. MBIs have proven effective in reducing anxiety and depression among patients with conditions like multiple sclerosis, enhancing personal well-being, and alleviating chronic pain. Given the mounting evidence supporting its benefits, MBIs have become widely adopted across various settings. Nonetheless, the precise mechanisms through which mindfulness alleviates emotional distress remain poorly understood. Rumination, a transdiagnostic process, plays a critical role in the development and persistence of emotional distress. Empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of MBIs in reducing rumination. However, the role of rumination in mediating the effects of MBIs on emotional distress remains inconsistent across studies. Kazdin (2007, 2009) outlined criteria for evaluating mechanisms and mediators, yet existing studies lack sufficient evidence to meet these standards. This study aims to explore the mechanistic role of rumination using behavioral experiments, focusing on the consistency criterion
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
160
Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress (MIED) program provides standard audio instructions for mindfulness exercises, introduces the nature and law of anxiety, depression, and other emotions, the source of anxiety, depression, and other emotional distress, and the strategies and methods to alleviate emotional distress. These exercises, knowledge and strategies are based on the latest progress in the field of psychological counseling and treatment, and their application in daily life can help alleviate anxiety, depression and other emotional problems.
Changes of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire during the intervention
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire is a self-reported questionnaire measuring mindfulness levels. Scores range from 39 to 195, with higher scores indicating higher levels of mindfulness.
Time frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale during the intervention
The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring distress. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress.
Time frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire during the intervention
Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire is a self-reported questionnaire measuring Rumination level.Scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of Rumination.
Time frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale during the intervention
The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
Time frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale during the intervention
The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depression. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression.
Time frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of the Brief State Rumination Inventory during the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The Brief State Rumination Inventory comprises eight items designed to measure an individual's state rumination tendency at a given moment, encompassing aspects such as the intensity of negative emotions, repetitive thinking, loss of thought control, and the strength of negative affect. The total score, which is derived by summing up the scores of all items, indicates the overall level of the measured construct.
Time frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of the momentary repetitive negative thinking during the intervention
momentary repetitive negative thinking measures the "process" characteristics of rumination, which are traits that exist across diagnostic categories. The scale consists of four items (e.g., "Thoughts come to my mind that I would rather not have"). Each item focuses on a core feature of rumination - repetitiveness, intrusiveness, uncontrollability, and disruptiveness. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale, where 1 = not at all and 7 = extremely.
Time frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention