The goal of this quasi experimental study is to develop and assess the effectiveness of an early palliative care intervention in patients with oral cancer in Sri Lanka. The main question it aims to answer is whether the early palliative care intervention improves the quality of life and psychological distress of patients with cancer in Sri Lanka. The primary outcome measures were patient's quality of life and level of psychological distress If there is a comparison group: Researchers compared with a control group who received the standard care to see if the novel early palliative care intervention helped to improve the primary outcomes. Participants in the intervention arm received the early palliative care package which consisted of 6 components including: 1) providing information, 2) addressing acute and functional issues, 3) nutritional care, 4) psychological support, 5) mindfulness therapy, and 6) coordination of the financial allowance. The intervention was delivered by the Principal Investigator and the trained Public Helath Nursing Officers.
The study took place at three tertiary care units providing oral cancer treatment in Sri Lanka: the oral and maxillofacial wards at the National Dental Hospital, Colombo (Teaching); the oral and maxillofacial wards at Colombo South (Teaching) Hospital, Karapitiya; and the onco-surgery wards at the National Cancer Institute Maharagama (Apeksha Hospital). Participants The study participants were patients with oral cancer whose definitive diagnosis had been communicated to the patient and had psychological distress (score of ≥4 after screening with the Sinhala version of the Distress Thermometer); awaiting surgery as the first treatment modality; and married with children, including at least one family caregiver with the ability to communicate and read well in Sinhalese. Exclusion criteria were, recurrent oral cancer; a formal psychiatric diagnosis; and receiving or having received any early palliative care intervention. They were divided to 55 controls and 55 cases based on the availability of an accessible Public Health Nursing Officer. Interventions The early palliative care package, comprising six components, was delivered in three sessions by the principal investigator (PI) and Public Health Nursing Officers. Outcome measures The effectiveness was assessed by the level of psychological distress using the Sinhala version of the Distress Thermometer and Level of quality of life using EORTC QLQ 30 with module H\&N 35 at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), one month (T2), and three months (T3).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
110
The early palliative care intervention package was developed following the guidelines provided by the UK Medical Research Council for the development of complex interventions. The early palliative care intervention for patients with oral cancer had six components: 1) providing information, 2) addressing acute and functional issues, 3) nutritional care, 4) psychological support, 5) mindfulness therapy, and 6) coordination of the financial allowance. The package was formulated by triangulating literature review findings and several independent studies: a case-control study; in-depth interviews with experts in the field of oncology and palliative care in Sri Lanka; key-informant interviews with patients with oral cancer and their caregivers; and an observation study at the National Cancer Institute Sri Lanka- Apeksha Hospital). The intervention package was finalized through a
Karapitiya Teaching Hospital
Galle, Southern Province, Sri Lanka
National Dental Hospital
Colombo, Western Province, Sri Lanka
Apeksha Hospital
Colombo, Western Province, Sri Lanka
Colombo South (Teaching) Hospital
Colombo, Western Province, Sri Lanka
Patient's quality of life
Quality of life was measured using the Sinhala version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (version C30) -EORTC QLQ 30. This tool was translated and validated to Sri Lanka through a large-scale multi-centre study. This tool measured quality of life in three sub dimensions-Global Health Status, Functional Scale and Symptom Scale. a high score in Global Health Status denoted a high quality of life, a high score for Functional Scale meant healthy level of functioning and a high score in Symptom Scale represented high level of problems
Time frame: This outcome measure was collected at four-time points: at enrollment, immediately after delivering the intervention package, 1 month after and three months after the intervention.
Patient's level of psychological distress
The level of psychological distress was measured through the mean scores of the Sinhala version of the Distress Thermometer. The Distress Thermometer is 1 item, an ultra-short, visual analogue screening tool, originally developed in the America for prostate cancer patients in 1998. The Distress Thermometer comes with a Problem List. This has 35 items and it covers 5 life domains (practical, family/social, emotional, spiritual, and physical problems). The Distress Thermometer and Problem List were translated into the Sinhala language (the primary language in Sri Lanka) and cross-culturally adapted to Sri Lanka.
Time frame: The outcome measures were collected at four-time points: at enrollment, immediately after delivering the intervention package, one month and three months after the intervention.
Patient's quality of life related to the Head and Neck condition
This was measured using Head \& Neck-35 module (H\&N-35) by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. This tool was translated and validated to Sri Lanka through a large-scale multi-centre study. A high score in H\&N-35 module also meant high level of problems whcih meant low quality of life.
Time frame: This outcome measure was collected at four-time points: at enrollment, immediately after delivering the intervention package, 1 month after and three months after the intervention.
Patient's satisfaction
Patient's satisfaction with the novel intervention was measured using a validated questionnaire.
Time frame: This was measured 3 months after the delivery of the intervention package
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.