The purpose of this study is to examine femur bone mineral density (BMD) change before and after surgery in patients receiving cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA). performed with manual or robotic methods. 100 participants will be enrolled and can expect to be on study for up to 26 months.
It has previously been reported that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) causes major femur bone loss (\~18% within 1 year). Prior studies did not examine different surgical methods, such as the use of cement or robotics, in TKA. The investigators hypothesize that previously reported differences in distal femur BMD change following TKA exist between patients receiving cemented vs. cementless prostheses. Specific Aim 1: In the entire study cohort, our primary endpoint is to estimate percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur 25% region of interest (ROI). Specific Aim 1a: To compare percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur 25% ROI in cemented vs uncemented implants. Specific Aim 1b: To compare percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur 25% ROI in those receiving robotic vs manual implants. Specific Aim 2: In the entire study cohort, our secondary endpoints are to estimate percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at a.) the distal femur 15% ROI and b.) a proximal tibial ROI Specific Aim 2a: To compare percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur 15% ROI and proximal tibial ROI in cemented vs uncemented implants. Specific Aim 2b: To compare percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur 15% ROI and proximal tibial ROI in in those receiving robotic vs manual implants. Exploratory Aim 1: Compare patient reported pain and function at 2 weeks, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months; 1. in those receiving cemented and cementless implants. 2. in those receiving robotic vs manual implants. Exploratory Aim 2: Evaluate leg lean mass change as measured by DXA and BIS at 2 weeks, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months over time. 1. In the entire cohort 2. in those receiving cemented and cementless implants. 3. in those receiving robotic vs manual implants.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
The cemented approach includes inserting cement into the femur and tibia prior to setting the prosthetic.
The non-cement approach uses a different type of prosthetic that is placed tight against the bone and requires no other fixation material.
The manual approach is the surgeon determining prosthetic placement using techniques developed during training.
UW School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
RECRUITINGPercent Change in Bone Mineral Density within 25 percent of the region of interest at 12 and 24 months post TKA: All Participants
Primary endpoint is to estimate percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur, 25 percent region of interest, reported for all participants together.
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months
Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density within 25 percent of the region of interest at 12 and 24 months post TKA: Cemented vs Uncemented
Compare percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur, 25 percent region of interest between all cemented and uncemented implants.
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months
Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density within 25 percent of the region of interest at 12 and 24 months post TKA: Robotic vs Manual
Compare percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur, 25 percent region of interest between all robotic vs manual implants.
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months
Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density within 15 percent of the region of interest at 12 and 24 months post TKA: All Participants
Secondary endpoint is to estimate percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur and the proximal tibia, 15 percent region of interest, reported for all participants together.
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months
Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density within 15 percent of the region of interest at 12 and 24 months post TKA: Cemented vs Uncemented
Compare percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur and the proximal tibia, 15 percent region of interest, reported for cemented vs uncemented implants.
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The haptic robotic assisted approach uses a computer and robot to determine specific placement of the prosthetic.
Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density within 15 percent of the region of interest at 12 and 24 months post TKA: Robotic vs Manual
Compare percent BMD change 12 and 24 months after TKA at the distal femur and the proximal tibia, 15 percent region of interest, reported for robotic vs manual implants.
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months