The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel non-intercostal robotic approach for minimally invasive esophagectomy (OTC MIE) in the treatment of esophageal cancer. This study aims to determine whether OTC MIE reduces the risk of acute and chronic chest pain compared to traditional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and improves postoperative outcomes for patients. Participants will undergo either the OTC MIE procedure or a traditional MIE approach as part of their treatment for esophageal cancer. Postoperative outcomes, including chest pain and recovery metrics, will be closely monitored. Follow-up assessments will be conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of the novel approach. The investigators aim to recruit 31 patients.
Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common cancer diagnosis worldwide, with approximately 604,000 new cases in 2022. Esophagectomy remains a cornerstone of esophageal cancer treatment, typically combined with perioperative chemoradiation for locally advanced disease. The procedure can be performed using various approaches, including open surgery and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). MIE combines laparoscopy with thoracic techniques such as video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted surgery (RA), aiming to minimize trauma and improve both postoperative and long-term outcomes. While VATS and RA have demonstrated reduced cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality compared to open esophagectomy, both methods still involve intercostal incisions. These incisions can cause trauma to intercostal nerves and bundles, potentially leading to acute and chronic postoperative chest pain. The evolution of minimally invasive techniques in thoracic and lung surgery has focused on reducing the size and number of incisions to minimize surgical trauma. However, even with these advancements, intercostal instrumentation remains a source of significant postoperative complications. Our group has developed a novel non-intercostal robotic approach for thoracic surgery called Outside the Cage (OTC) RATS. This technique was successfully implemented in over 60 lung resections, with the first published series showing promising outcomes, including feasibility, safety, and reduced postoperative pain. Additionally, results from a phase I clinical trial (NCT05832112) confirmed the safety and feasibility of this approach, with trends indicating faster recovery and less postoperative pain. Based on this experience, we recently performed the world's first OTC esophagectomy and have since refined the technique with successful outcomes, including no conversions to open surgery, transfusions, or major complications. This study is a prospective pilot phase I trial designed to assess the feasibility and safety of OTC MIE in patients treated for esophageal cancer. Patients eligible for participation will include those already scheduled for MIE based on clinical indications such as tumor size, location, and individual characteristics. By avoiding intercostal instrumentation, we hypothesize that the OTC MIE approach will positively impact postoperative outcomes, enhancing recovery and reducing complications. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of performing OTC MIE. The secondary objective is to systematically analyze the safety and postoperative recovery of patients undergoing this technique. This trial is timely given our institution's extensive experience with both traditional MIE and OTC RATS. The results of this study could have significant implications for clinical practice by demonstrating the benefits of a non-intercostal approach for esophageal cancer surgery, potentially improving patient recovery and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
31
Consenting patients will undergo minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) using the Out of the Cage (OTC) robotic-assisted technique. The procedure will follow the exact standard steps of traditional VATS/RATS esophagectomy, except the thoracic ports will be placed in the subcostal plane. The number of ports (1-4) will be determined based on the patient and case characteristics. The Da Vinci Xi® surgical system will be used to perform the thoracic portion of the esophagectomy through subcostal ports using the standard technique. Once the procedure is completed, the robotic arms and ports will be removed from the chest, and figure-of-8 stitches with non-absorbable sutures will be placed to close the diaphragm at the port sites. A 24 Fr soft chest tube will be left in place, as per standard VATS/RATS esophagectomy protocols. Incisions will be closed in the standard manner.
CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Conversion rate
Feasibility will be evaluated by completion of the procedure without conversion of the approach or technique. Any change in the treatment plan requiring the use of intercostal ports, conversion to conventional minimally invasive thoracic surgery through intercostal incisions, or conversion to open surgery
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
30-day mortality
Safety will be evaluated by 30-day mortality. Any dead occurring during the hospital stay or within 30 days after discharge will be registered.
Time frame: 30 days after discharge
Length of stay
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Operative time
Surgical operative time including robot positioning
Time frame: Intraoperative
Estimated blood loss
Registered by the OR nurse team
Time frame: Intraoperative
Postoperative pain
Pain scores on a visual analog scale: Pain Rating Scale between 0 and 10 (0: better outcome and 10:Worse outcome)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality of recovery
Assessment of postoperative recovery using Quality Of Recovery (QOR-15) questionnaire between 0 and 10 (0: Better outcome and 10: Worst outcome)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Analgesic complementation requirement
Number of participants who need of adding analgesia medication out of the analgesic pathway used in our center for conventional RATS/VATS
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Serious adverse events
Complications derived from the operation that altered the pathway
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Perioperative complications
Complications including intraoperative and postoperative occurring during the hospital stay or within 30 days after discharge will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Evaluate Chronic Pain
Pain scores on a visual analog scale: Pain Rating Scale between 0 and 10 (0: better outcome and 10:Worse outcome). Chronic pain of OTC RATS lobectomy patients will be compared to that of VATS lobectomy patients, for which the data will also be collected and analysed retrospectively.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.