SPiT-frequency II_Peri-implantitis

Overview

This is an interventional clinical study on the peri-implant treatment necessary to improve the clinical conditions surrounding dental implants registered with peri-implant inflammation. The focus of this double-armed, examiner blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial is to examine the effect of short-term increased frequency of a Non-surgical protocol on implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis. The study is a part of a project assessing the frequency of supportive peri-implant therapy. The current is on non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis (inflammation and exposed implant surface). The other study is a RCT on treatment of peri-implant mucositis (inflammation and no attachment loss at the implants) and secondary prevention of peri-implant mucositis (REK 790097). Exposure of rough surface may dramatically change the frequency of maintenance needed to improve the inflammatory condition. Thus, a segregation between adequate and low bone level at the implant is necessary. Subjects with more than one implant and both diagnoses, may be enrolled in both studies, following the frequency of treatment randomized in the peri-implant mucositis study

At the screening visit, the following tests and examination will be carried out to screen eligible subjects and provide baseline information for those patients that meet the study criteria: * Anamnestic information as described in the regular electronic dental journal at the Faculty of Dentistry is collected * Assessment of clinical registrations; suppuration, plaque, gingival bleeding, PPD, Bleeding index score and presence of keratinized mucosa * Assessment of existing radiographs to ensure the subject and implants are eligible according to inclusion criteria * Written and oral information on the study will be given * Thorough information and instruction in plaque control with tools deemed appropriate by the operator * Information about the study is given orally and written together with informed consent sheet Visit 1 Baseline Signed inform consent is collected An experienced, calibrated and board certified specialist in periodontology ("Examiner") performs the following clinical registrations at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) of the included implants: Plaque: the presence or absence recognized by running a probe across the marginal surface of the implant (Mombelli et al. 1987). If plaque is present at the implants to be included, OHI is repeated and Baseline examination is rescheduled PICF (peri implant cravicular fluid): Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) will be collected from one site per implant, at the site with the most severe lesion at the baseline. Suppuration: the presence or absence after light pressure against gingiva/mucosa or following gentle probing of the peri-implant pocket. Mucosal bleeding: registered according to the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI) (Mombelli et al. 1987). PPD: recorded with a pressure- sensitive probe (20 g) (University of North Carolina probe, Aesculap, Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany). Bleeding index score: measured at the implants after probing at six sites, and graded (0-3): 0 = no bleeding, 1. = spot bleeding, 2. = line bleeding 3. = profound bleeding within 30 seconds after measurement of PPD. Presence of keratinized mucosa: registered at the mid buccal site as "adequate" ≥2 mm, "inadequate" \<2 mm (Moraschini et al. 2017). Buccal recession; the distance from a fixed point - suprastructure/abutment connection to the mucosal margin in mm Saliva samples; Stimulated saliva will be collected for 5 min in sterile ice-chilled tubes while chewing on Parafilm. The following procedures will be performed by "the Operator" Radiographs of the implants showing clear projections of the implant threads at the mesial and distal surfaces will be taken using standard Eggens holders All included implants receive the following treatment: Repeated oral hygiene instruction if needed Submucosal instrumentation with ultrasonic device with a PEEK tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline Supramucosal polishing using polishing paste and rubber cup Following treatment, if local anesthesia was not applied, the subjects will be asked to grade the level of pain experienced on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The Examiner leaves the room prior to randomization performed by the Operator by opening a concealed envelope stating "test" or "control". Each subject may have more than one implant included in the study. All the implants will be scheduled for the same frequency of SPiT 3-, 6- and 9 weeks following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At these time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator (non-blinded examination) and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered 12 weeks (3 month) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above VAS scales are registered 16 weeks (4 month) following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At this time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered 24 weeks (6 month) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered 36 weeks (9 month) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered Radiographs are taken according to the baseline examination Referring dentist/dental hygienist (if any) is given written information about the treatment performed and the result, and suggested routines of follow-up is suggested