Warts caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV) are one of the most common skin conditions among children. The prevalence of warts in school-aged children ranges from 10 to 20 percent. Warts are more common among immunocompromised patients \[1, 2\]. Some studies also show that the prevalence of viral warts in the pediatric population increases with age, peaking in adolescence. HPV is a DNA virus that replicates only in fully differentiated epithelial cells. More than 80 types of HPV have been identified. Types 27, 57, 2, and 1 are the most common types of HPV in skin warts in the general population. Warts usually affect patients of different age groups and various parts of the body, causing physical and psychological complications for patients (such as pain, discomfort, and embarrassment), which in turn lead to functional impairment. Warts often affect pressure points on the soles of the feet. Although most warts are asymptomatic, plantar warts are often associated with pain while walking, causing physical and psychological stress \[3\]. Various treatments such as keratolytic agents, cryotherapy, laser, antimitotic treatments, contact sensitizers, and intralesional injection of antigen have been used. There is no evidence that one treatment is superior to others, and in many cases, treatment of viral warts requires a combination of treatments. Treatment selection for patients should be based on variables such as wart size, number of lesions, anatomical location, patient preference, cost, convenience, side effects, and operator experience. It is important to emphasize that good communication between the patient, parents, and dermatologist is essential for successful treatment in children \[2, 4\]. Despite having various treatment approaches, treating plantar warts is challenging. No single treatment is effective in most patients, treatments are often painful, and they are associated with a high recurrence rate. Although nearly 75 percent of warts can resolve spontaneously within two years, patients often seek treatment for cosmetic reasons and pain. Many studies have examined the use of vitamin D compounds (calcipotriol) and 5-fluorouracil in wart patients separately or in combination with other drugs, but only one recent case report that tested the combination of these two showed very positive efficacy results \[5, 6\]. To date, no clinical trial has evaluated the combination of calcipotriol and 5-fluorouracil. Additionally, given that common current treatments such as cryotherapy are painful for children, achieving an effective, pain-free intervention is necessary. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of the combination of 5-fluorouracil and calcipotriol in children (ages 4 to 18) with palmar and plantar warts in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
60
Topical 5% fluorouracil cream twice daily for 21 days on the affected area (palmoplantar)
Topical 0.005% calcipotriol ointment twice daily for 21 days on the affected area (palmoplatar)
A placebo ointment in identical tubes in terms of color and scent and with identical usage instructions to calcipotriol.
A placebo cream in identical tubes in terms of color and scent and with identical usage instructions to fluorouracil.
Iran
Sari, Mazandaran, Iran
RECRUITINGTreatment respone
Treatment respone * No response: The wart shows no visible reduction in size, texture, or color, and there is no improvement in symptoms after the treatment. * Partial or Poor response: The wart demonstrates a reduction in size, texture, or color, but it is not completely resolved. Some improvement in symptoms may be noted, but the wart remains partially present. * Complete response: The wart is fully resolved with no visible signs remaining. All symptoms are eliminated, and the skin appears almost normal at the site of the wart.
Time frame: The number of lesions is recorded at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Number of Lesions
This outcome measures the total count of wart lesions present on a patient at each assessment point during the study. The number of lesions is recorded before the start of treatment and monitored at regular intervals throughout the treatment period and follow-up visits. The change in the number of lesions over time helps assess the effectiveness of the treatment in reducing wart lesions.
Time frame: The number of lesions is recorded at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Size Change (Number of Lesions)
Size Change (Number of Lesions) This outcome tracks the change in size of the wart lesions over time, categorizing them into two options: * Decrease: The lesions have reduced in size compared to the initial measurement taken before the start of treatment. * Increase: The lesions have grown in size compared to the initial measurement taken before the start of treatment.
Time frame: The size change is evaluated at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Adverse Events
Adverse Events This outcome tracks the occurrence of any adverse events experienced by the patient during the study. Adverse events are monitored and recorded at each assessment point. * No: The patient does not experience any adverse events related to the treatment. * Yes: The patient experiences one or more adverse events. If "Yes," the adverse events are described in detail, including the type, severity, duration, and any measures taken to manage the events.
Time frame: Adverse events are assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Photography
Photographs are taken of all patients at each assessment point to document the visual appearance of the wart lesions. This provides a visual record to support the assessment of treatment response and size change.
Time frame: These photographs are taken at 0, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.