The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the most effective empirical therapy of antibiotics for better ventilator-associated pneumonia control. The main question it aims to answer is: • Which is better for clinical response single or combination empiric antibiotic therapies ?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
64
In the case of XDR or PDR Pseudomonas spp. or Acinetobacter spp. isolation from the patient's specimen, treatment was adjusted to extended meropenem infusion in combination with other options such as Polymyxin, Tigecycline, Ertapenem, or Amikacin in group (A) of patients.
In the case of XDR or PDR Pseudomonas spp. or Acinetobacter spp. isolation from the patient's specimen, treatment was adjusted to include two β-lactam antibiotics plus a single non-β-lactam antibiotic, or a combination of double β-lactam antibiotics, with the aim of avoiding aggressive and toxic antibiotics in group (B) of patients
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) at Cairo University's Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, Egypt
Antimicrobial susceptibility
Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed through Kirby-Bauer's disc diffusion method (DD), Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) using the automated VITEK 2 compact system (bioMérieux, France), and the Ameri-Ziaei Double Antibiotic Synergism Test (AZDAST). Interpretation of DD and MIC results followed CLSI guidelines.
Time frame: 7 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Treatment was adjusted to the second-line empirical antibiotic according to the hospital's local policy.