The objective of this study is to demonstrate the clinical validity, analytical validity and safety of ViewMind Atlas as an adjunctive tool to be used by healthcare professionals (HCP) evaluating cognitive impairment in adults aged 45 to 95 years old.
This will be a comparative study in which each subject undergoes testing by certified HCP evaluators administering the and ViewMind AtlasTM evaluation and the MoCA test, as well as additional tests, which are part of a reference standard neurocognitive battery of tests for cognition (WAT-BA, BEM-144, Rey Complex Figure Test, Wechsler Memory Scale subtests, WAIS III subtests, Trail Making Test A and B, Boston Naming Test, Phonological Verbal Fluency test, Semantic Verbal Fluency test, and Clock Drawing Test). Test-retest reliability of ViewMind AtlasTM will be conducted one week after initial testing. Primary Objective: ● To assess the clinical validity of ViewMind Atlas for identifying cognitive impairment, as determined by MoCA Secondary Objectives: * To demonstrate the analytical validity of ViewMind Atlas for measuring cognition (evaluated) against an appropriate reference standard (MoCA) * To examine the discriminant and convergence validity between ViewMind AtlasTM and a battery of neurocognitive tests in identifying cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired test subjects. * To compare the test-retest reliability of ViewMind AtlasTM. * To assess the safety of the ViewMind system. 1. Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp) Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) positive likelihood ratios, and negative likelihood ratios and Accuracy of ViewMind AtlasTM agreement with the classification of MoCA in identifying cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired test participants. 2. Correlation between the results obtained with ViewMind Atlas™ and the scores of each component of the MoCA test 3. Correlation between the results obtained with ViewMind Atlas™ and the scores of each component of the neurocognitive test battery 4. Regression analysis of test-retest reliability for ViewMind AtlasTM. 5. Collection of adverse events (AEs) Total no. of subjects: 327 * n= 128 for test-retest of ViewMind This study will be conducted in one site: Ramos Mejia Hospital, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. This study is estimated to last 16 weeks, from start of enrollment to final data analysis. All participants will attend at least a single visit during which the cognitive evaluations will be carried out. 128 participants will then come back for a second visit 1-3 weeks after the first visit, to undergo another cognitive evaluation with ViewMind.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
270
The intervention involves the use of ViewMind Atlas™, a novel digital tool for cognitive assessment, and traditional cognitive tests. The ViewMind Atlas™ device evaluates cognitive performance through eye-tracking technology and advanced analytics, providing objective measurements of cognitive function. Traditional cognitive tests are used as the standard comparator to validate the device's diagnostic performance
Ramos Mejía Hospital
Buenos Aires City, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Accuracy of ViewMind Atlas™ in Identifying Cognitive Impairment
Evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and likelihood ratios (positive and negative) of ViewMind Atlas™ compared to clinical diagnosis rendered by qualified providers using standard neuropsychological assessments.
Time frame: At baseline (Visit 1)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.