The purpose of this multicenter retrospective cohort study is to determine the effect of radiotherapy on capsular contraction and implant loss rates in patients undergoing prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) comparing Polyurethan (PU) and non-PU covered implants.
Breast cancer affects 2.6 million women worldwide annually, with surgery as the standard treatment for 95% of cases. Rising mastectomy rates, due to advanced diagnostic tools and patient preferences, make immediate breast reconstruction crucial for improving quality of life for around 650,000 women each year. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) has become a preferred approach due to advancements like synthetic meshes, acellular dermal matrices (ADM), and polyurethane (PU) covered implants, which show promise in reducing complications such as capsular contracture, implant loss, and breast animation deformities. Radiotherapy (RT), however, increases these risks, especially for capsular contracture, underscoring the need for strategies to mitigate such outcomes. This multicenter retrospective cohort study will investigate the impact of radiotherapy on complications such as capsular contracture and implant loss in patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and prepectoral IBBR. The study will compare outcomes between PU and non-PU covered implants using data from approximately 30 international sites. Patient information will be extracted from hospital records, coded for confidentiality, and analyzed statistically to achieve the study's objectives of improving post-reconstruction outcomes and quality of life for patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,000
Radiotherapy post-mastectomy prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR)
University Hospital Basel
Basel, Switzerland
capsular contracture
capsular contracture rate in women with IBBR in combination with RT comparing the use of PU with non-PU implants
Time frame: 2-6 years post-surgery
implant loss rate
To determine the implant loss rate in women with IBBR in combination with RT comparing the use of PU with non-PU implants
Time frame: 2-6 years post-surgery
re-surgery rate
To determine the re-surgery rate in women with IBBR in combination with RT comparing the use of PU with non-PU implants
Time frame: 2-6 years post-surgery
hematoma rate
To determine the hematoma rate in women with IBBR in combination with RT comparing the use of PU with non-PU implants
Time frame: 2-6 years post-surgery
infection rate
To determine the infection rate in women with IBBR in combination with RT comparing the use of PU with non-PU implants
Time frame: 2-6 years post-surgery
implant exchange rate
To determine the implant exchange rate in women with IBBR in combination with RT comparing the use of PU with non-PU implants
Time frame: 2-6 years post-surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.