Heart failure (HF) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, despite advances in treatment. HF is often characterized by an altered metabolism in the heart, where glucose is favored over fatty acids as the primary energy substrate. This metabolic shift has been hypothesized to contribute to disease progression. Previous studies using animal models have demonstrated that restoring fatty acid metabolism through dietary intervention can reverse the adverse metabolic effects and improve heart function. A transgenic murine model with mitochondrial defects, for instance, exhibited improved cardiac function after an HFD intervention. These findings were reinforced by a translational pig model of non-ischemic DCM, where a high-fat diet significantly improved LVEF compared to a standard diet. Building upon these promising preclinical results, a small-scale human study showed that lipid infusion, rather than glucose, improved cardiac function in HF patients. However, the long-term benefits of a HFD in heart failure patients have yet to be thoroughly explored. The HF4HF trial aims to fill this gap by evaluating the effects of an HFD over a two-month period in patients with non-ischemic DCM and reduced LVEF. The "High Fat Diet for Heart Failure" (HF4HF) study is a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial designed to investigate the efficacy of a high-fat diet (HFD) as a therapeutic intervention in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The study hypothesizes that cardiac metabolic reprogramming, achieved through a controlled nutritional intervention involving an HFD, can enhance systolic function, myocardial energetics, and overall heart function in heart failure (HF) patients. Cofunded by the European Commission and national entities, the trial is spearheaded by a consortium of cardiovascular research centers across four countries: Spain, Italy, France, and Romania.
Despite the notable therapeutic advancements, heart failure (HF) remains a significant cause of morbi-mortality worldwide, that justifies the need of identifying novel treatment strategies targeting non-redundant disease pathways.The heart, being the organ with the highest energy demands, produces over 5 kg of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) per day under normal conditions to support its functions. To meet this substantial energy requirement, the myocardium utilizes various substrates, being the oxidation of fatty acids the primary source, due to their efficiency in ATP production compared to carbohydrates and amino acids.However, HF, regardless of its etiology and across the entire spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), often involves an altered cardiac metabolism characterized by a preference for glucose over fatty acids as an energy source.While previously considered a protective mechanism, recent findings challenge this notion. Preclinical investigations using a transgenic murine model with mitochondrial alterations in cardiomyocytes revealed a shift in energy substrate utilization from fatty acids to glucose, resulting in progressive dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with reduced ejection fraction. Administering a high-fat diet (HFD) to these mice restored normal myocardial metabolism, leading to disease regression.Building upon these findings, a subsequent study was conducted by members of HF4HF Consortium, in a translational pig model of non-ischemic DCM and LVEF \<50%, through the generation of hibernated myocardium. These pigs were randomly assigned to either a standard diet (regular chow) or a HFD (80% regular chow plus 20% lard, rich in palmitic, oleic, stearic and linoleic acids). Following a two-month intervention, pigs receiving the HFD showed a significant increase in LVEF from 41% to 56%, compared to controls whose LVEF only slightly changed from 40% to 38% (p 0.012). At the end of the protocol, the cardiomyocytes from pigs who were on regular diet displayed fragmented mitochondria and presence of abundant lipid droplets, suggestive of poor lipid trafficking and storage. At a molecular level, hibernated myocardium with HF was associated with a significant downregulation of proteins involved in lipid import from cytosol to mitochondria (CRAT and ACOX1), along with a compensatory upregulation of glucose transport proteins (GLUT1), something that was completely restored after 2 months of HFD. Altogether, these data show that HF is associated with an impaired intracellular fatty acid traffic responsible for the metabolic switch. HFD was able to revert the altered lipid handling, allowing a metabolic reprograming having mitochondria use again fatty acids. The metabolic reprograming was further reinforced by the in vivo 18F-FDG PET studies, which showed a significant modification in the glucose uptake in HFD versus control diet pigs. All these outstanding results underscored the potential of high-fat dietary intervention in ameliorating systolic function in non-ischemic DCM. Finally, a recent human study involving 20 patients with non-ischemic HF and reduced LVEF examined the effects of intravenous glucose plus insulin infusion versus lipid infusion of long-chain fatty acids, in terms of cardiac function and energetics, assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and MR spectroscopy 1 hour after the infusion. The lipid infusion notably enhanced cardiac function, increasing LVEF from 35% to 40%, whereas glucose plus insulin infusion showed no impact on disease parameters. Moreover, significant improvements in diastolic function, and myocardial energetics, assessed by 13P and the phosphocreatine/ATP ratio, were reported after intralipid infusion; findings that support the hypothesis of remaining metabolic substrate flexibility of the failing heart. However, this study only assessed the acute effects of lipid exposure on cardiac function and energetics, lacking long-term evidence regarding the efficacy of employing a high-fat dietary pattern in HF management. Nonetheless, this novel approach holds promise in the medical-nutritional management of this prevalent disease.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
Weekly isocaloric dietary profile, with total daily energy intake distributed as follows: 70% from fats, primarily sourced from nuts, extra virgin olive oil, avocados, and animal fats from fish and cheese; protein intake of 0.8-1.2 g per kg body weight (10-20%); and the remaining calories from carbohydrates (10-20%).
Weekly isocaloric dietary profile, with total daily energy intake distributed as follows: 30% from fats, primarily sourced from nuts, extra virgin olive oil, avocados, and animal fats from fish and cheese; protein intake of 0.8-1.2 g per kg body weight (10-20%); and 50-60% from carbohydrates.
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, INSERM
Paris, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversity of Florence, Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Clinical Nutrition,
Florence, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest,
Bucharest, Romania
RECRUITINGFundación Investigación Biomédica Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro (IIS),
Madrid, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz,
Madrid, Spain
RECRUITINGChanges in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Changes in LVEF assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Left ventricular strain
Changes in left ventricular strain assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Diastolic function
Changes in diastolic function assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
White blood cells
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Red blood cells
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Hemoglobin
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Platelets
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Glucose
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
HDL-cholesterol
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
LDL-cholesterol
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Triglycerides
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium)
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Kidney function (creatinine, urea)
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Vitamins (vitamin B12, 25-OH Vitamin D, folate)
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Albumin
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Iron metabolism (iron, ferritin)
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
Liver function (AST, ALT, γGT)
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
C-reactive protein
Quantification with standard laboratory procedures
Time frame: At baseline, month 2 and month 4
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.