This clinical trial will address the gap in published data on the effect of dolutegravir (DTG)-associated drug-resistant mutations on viral suppression among people remaining on DTG-based antiretroviral therapy. It will also address the gap in the optimal management strategy for this population.
BACKGROUND: The majority of people living with HIV (PLWH) on first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries are on dolutegravir (DTG)-containing regimens. Different countries have adopted different approaches in the management of people on DTG-based first-line ART with repeat HIV viral load (VL) of \> 1,000 copies/mL after 3 months of enhanced adherence counselling. For example, Kenya recommends a drug resistance test (DRT) to guide on switch and the optimal second-line regimen; Mozambique and Tanzania recommend switch to 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) without drug resistance testing; South Africa does not recommend switch from DTG or DRT for those who are on first-line DTG-containing regimens within the first 2 years of treatment, after which management is guided by possible DRT and expert opinion. The World Health Organization has recognised the role of drug resistance testing (DRT) in a treatment failure algorithm for people living with HIV receiving DTG-based treatment to minimise unnecessary switches from this regimen. The switch to PI has disadvantages including higher cost, higher pill burden, less convenient administration (often should be taken with food), more potential drug-drug interactions, poorer tolerability and more long-term toxicities. GOAL: To assess the efficacy and safety of remaining on DTG compared to switching to DRV/r among people failing DTG-based ART with at least one major DTG DRM. METHODS: This is a phase 3b, multi-country, open-label, two-arm, active-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) over 12 months describing the efficacy and safety of switching from DTG to DRV/r among PLWH age ≥ 3 years who are failing DTG-based ART with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 200 copies/mL and ≥ 1 major DTG-associated DRM (and most recent prior HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1,000 copies/mL after at least 6 months on DTG-based ART). The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 200 copies/mL at month 6. The study will be conducted in 9 sites in Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania and Lesotho targeting 392 participants including 30 children aged between 3 and 14 years old. The primary efficacy analysis will assess the difference in the proportion of participants with viral suppression at month 6 using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method. This RCT is nested within an observational cohort study describing HIV-1 viral suppression of people with HIV-1 RNA value of ≥ 1,000 copies/mL after at least six months on DTG-based ART.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
392
Dose will be based on weight; brand names will be as supplied through the respective national programs
Dose will be based on weight
Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital
Kisumu, Kenya
RECRUITINGBomu Hospital
Mombasa, Kenya
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGKenyatta National Hospital
Nairobi, Kenya
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA of <200 copies/mL at 6 months
The comparative efficacy of switching to a DRV/r-based regimen after confirmed virologic failure and of remaining on DTG-based ART in achieving viral suppression of \<200 copies/mL at 6 months from randomization among participants with ≥1 major DTG-associated DRM
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA of <200 copies/mL at 12 months
Viral suppression to HIV-RNA of \<200 copies/mL at 12 months from randomization
Time frame: 12 months
Superiority of switch to DRV/r
Evaluate if switching to DRV/r-based ART after virologic failure is superior to remaining on DTG-based ART in achieving viral suppression to \<200 copies/mL at 6 months from randomization
Time frame: 6 months
Viral suppression with cut-off of 50 copies/mL
Evaluate the difference in viral suppression using HIV-RNA cut-off of \<50 copies/mL at 6 and 12 months from randomization
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Viral suppression with cut-off of 1,000 copies/mL
Evaluate the difference in viral suppression using HIV-RNA cut-off of \<1,000 copies/mL at 6 and 12 months from randomization
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Viral suppression by age strata
Viral load suppression rate by age strata: 3-9, 10-19, ≥20, 20-24, 25-34, 35-44, and ≥45 years old
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Viral suppression by sex at birth
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Butha-Buthe District Hospital
Butha-Buthe, Lesotho
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMokhotlong District Hospital
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCS Ponta Gea
Beira, Sofala, Mozambique
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCS Machava II
Maputo, Mozambique
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCS Ndlavela
Maputo, Mozambique
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMUHAS Clinical Trial Unit
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGViral load suppression based on participant's sex
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Incidence of adverse events by study arm
Incidence and severity of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Association between adherence and suppression
Adherence levels, based on DBS TFV-DP levels, associated with suppression and selection of treatment-emergent DRMs
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of drug resistant mutations (DRMs)
Incidence of treatment-emergent DRMs over 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Patterns of accumulated drug resistant mutations (DRMs)
Describe the patterns of accumulated drug resistant mutations over 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Drug resistant mutations (DRM) patterns associated with non-suppression
Evaluate drug resistant mutation patterns that are associated with sustained non-suppression
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Predictors of DTG-associated drug resistant mutations (DRMs)
Investigate the predictors of selection of DTG-associated drug resistant mutations
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Viral suppression by pre-enrolment nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)
Assess viral suppression based on pre-enrolment NRTI
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Viral suppression by tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus tenofovir alafenamide
Assess viral suppression based on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) as the study nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Change in cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) Count
The impact of regimen on change in cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Patient satisfaction as measured using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Status version (HIVTSQs) which scores 10 variables on a 7-point likert score ranging from 0 to 6 with a higher score representing a better outcome
Patient satisfaction (HIVTSQs) at baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Change in patient satisfaction as measured using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Change version (HIVTSQc) which scores 10 variables on a 7-point likert score ranging from -3 to +3 with a higher score representing a better outcome
Patient satisfaction (HIVTSQc) at month 6
Time frame: Month 6