Oral dysbiosis systematically develops during orthodontic treatment \[35\]\[36\]. Orthodontic appliances interfere with oral hygiene procedures and cause biofilm to accumulate, creating new retention zones, even in subjects who maintain correct oral hygiene \[37\]: * A group benefiting from intensive personalised prevention * A "conventionally monitored" group, with no personalised prevention. The hypothesis is that personalised prevention prevents dysbiosis from taking hold. If this hypothesis is confirmed, the concept could be extended to all patients, beyond orthodontics. Based on the "biological signature" (microbiological and immune), a "risk profile" of patients could be defined, making it possible to better personalise the prevention message, the method applied and the frequency of follow-up. The aim would be to rebalance dysbiosis through a personalised prevention approach tailored to the profile defined. It was decided to explore this hypothesis initially with orthodontic patients because they are "captive", i.e. in the course of treatment requiring regular visits. Prevention is aimed first and foremost at healthy patients, with the aim of maintaining them in good health. The project focuses on young patients undergoing orthodontic treatment
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
standard care combined with personalised prevention
standard care combined with personalised prevention
Rance Orthodontics Practice
Dinan, France
Nice university hospital
Nice, France
bacteria in biofilm
number of pathogenic bacteria measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At inclusion
bacteria in biofilm
number of pathogenic bacteria measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At 3 months
bacteria in biofilm
number of pathogenic bacteria measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At 6 months
bacteria in biofilm
number of pathogenic bacteria measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At 9 months
bacteria in biofilm
number of pathogenic bacteria measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At 12 months
viruses in biofilm
number of viruses measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At inclusion
viruses in biofilm
number of viruses measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At 3 months
viruses in biofilm
number of viruses measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At 6 months
viruses in biofilm
number of viruses measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At 9 months
viruses in biofilm
number of viruses measured in the biofilm
Time frame: At 12 months
patient's satisfaction
Patient satisfaction on a numerical scale from 0 to 10.
Time frame: at 12 months
measurement of immune response
assay of salivary cytokines in ng/ml
Time frame: At inclusion
measurement of immune response
assay of salivary cytokines in ng/ml
Time frame: At 3 months
measurement of immune response
assay of salivary cytokines in ng/ml
Time frame: At 6 months
measurement of immune response
assay of salivary cytokines in ng/ml
Time frame: At 9 months
measurement of immune response
assay of salivary cytokines in ng/ml
Time frame: At 12 months
plaque index
scale QHI: quigley hein index
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
gingival index,
gingival index mesured with Ginigical Index Loe\&Silness scale
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
toothbrush wear
toothbrush wear with the Toothbrush Wear Index (TWI)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.