This is a multi-center, retrospective clinical study designed to evaluate the application and effectiveness of an AI-assisted medical decision support system, leveraging multimodal data fusion, in ophthalmic clinical practice.
Visual impairments significantly affect an individual's quality of life. Early screening, diagnosis, and treatment of ocular diseases are crucial for preventing the onset and progression of vision disorders. In clinical practice, ophthalmologists often need to integrate a wide range of patient data, including demographic information, medical history, biochemical markers such as blood glucose and lipid levels, risk factors, as well as various ophthalmic data, such as fundus images, OCT scans, and visual field tests, to make an accurate diagnosis and develop an appropriate treatment plan. In an era where precision and personalized medicine are at the forefront of healthcare, the early detection and diagnosis of eye diseases, as well as the selection of suitable diagnostic and therapeutic strategies at different stages of the disease, have become significant challenges in clinical settings. Recent advancements in medical imaging and analysis techniques have greatly enhanced the accuracy and effectiveness of ocular disease diagnosis. This study aims to develop an ophthalmic artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making system by integrating multimodal data from imaging and electronic medical records, in combination with deep learning techniques. The objective is to improve diagnostic accuracy, streamline clinical workflows, and provide more personalized treatment options for patients. Ultimately, this system seeks to enhance treatment outcomes and improve the overall quality of life for patients suffering from ocular diseases.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
5,000,000
This intervention involves an AI system that leverages multimodal data fusion to support the clinical decision-making and evaluation of ophthalmic diseases. It integrates multi-modal data, including fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and patient clinical records, to provide real-time, precise, and personalized diagnostic support. Unlike other models, this system utilizes a longitudinal patient dataset to predict disease progression and treatment outcomes.Key distinguishing features include: 1. Multi-Modal Data Integration: Combines imaging, clinical, and genetic data for comprehensive analysis. 2. Predictive Capability: Offers advanced prognostic predictions, enabling personalized treatment plans. 3. Deep Learning Framework: Employs state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms for improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. 4. Real-World Validation: Validated using a large cohort of diverse patient data, ensuring generalizability and robustness.
ZhuHai Hospital, zhuhai, guangdong
Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
RECRUITINGFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
RECRUITINGSecond Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical Universit
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Area Under the Curve (AUC)
AUC of the ROC curve, used to quantify diagnostic accuracy. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a number between 0 and 1).
Time frame: 1 years
Sensitivity
Sensitivity (also called True Positive Rate) is a measure of how well a model identifies positive instances. It is defined as the proportion of actual positive cases correctly identified by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
Time frame: 1 years
Accuracy Accuracy Accuracy
Accuracy measures the proportion of all correct predictions (true positives and true negatives) out of the total number of cases evaluated by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
Time frame: 1 years
Specificity
Specificity (also called True Negative Rate) measures the proportion of actual negative cases correctly identified by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
Time frame: 1 years
False Positive Rate
False Positive Rate (FPR) measures the proportion of actual negative cases that are incorrectly identified as positive by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
Time frame: 1 years
False Negative Rate
False Negative Rate (FNR) measures the proportion of actual positive cases that are incorrectly identified as negative by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
Time frame: 1 years
Postoperative Complication Rate
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
RECRUITINGMacau University of Science and Technology Hospital
Macao, Macau, Macau
RECRUITINGPercentage (%) of patients experiencing postoperative complications.
Time frame: 1 years
Recurrence Risk Rate
Percentage (%) of patients experiencing recurrence during the follow-up period.
Time frame: 1 years
Survival Rate
Percentage (%) of patients alive, calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
Time frame: 1 years
Effectiveness of Decision Support
Percentage (%) improvement in the accuracy of treatment decisions with AI assistance compared to traditional decisions.
Time frame: 1 years
Decision Time Efficiency
Average time (seconds) required for physicians to make diagnostic and treatment decisions, before and after AI assistance.
Time frame: 1 years
System Usability Score
Evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS), with scores ranging from 0-100.
Time frame: 1 years
AI System Response Time
Average time (seconds) taken for the AI to provide recommendations after data input.
Time frame: 1 years
System Failure Rate
Frequency of AI system failures, measured as failures per thousand hours of use (failures/thousand hours).
Time frame: 1 years
User Interface Design Satisfaction
Evaluated using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), with scores ranging from 1-7.
Time frame: 1 years
Patient Satisfaction Score
Measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), with scores ranging from 8-32.
Time frame: 1 years
Treatment Adherence
Percentage (%) of patients adhering to personalized treatment plans and regular follow-up visits.
Time frame: 1 years
Physician Acceptance of AI System
Evaluated using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) scale, with scores ranging from 1-7.
Time frame: 1 years