This study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal injection of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with zoledronic acid for the treatment of malignant ascites in gastric cancer. This study is a phase Ib/II clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal injection of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with zoledronic acid in the treatment of malignant ascites in gastric cancer, which consists of two phases, firstly, the phase Ib safety study, which adopts the '3+3' drug-escalation experimental design, and after determining the safe and tolerable dose, it will proceed to the second part of the phase II efficacy study. The Phase II study was designed by Simon's two-stage approach to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with zoledronic acid in the treatment of malignant ascites in gastric cancer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
24
At D-5\~D-1, drain the ascites by placing a tube in the abdominal cavity first, try to drain the ascites as much as possible according to the clinical routine, and record the amount of drainage.D1, D8, D15, D22 start the first immunocheckpoint inhibitor combined with zoledronic acid treatment, try to drain the ascites first, calculate the amount of drugs according to the patient's body weight, and then dissolve the corresponding dosage of immunocheckpoint inhibitor and zoledronic acid in 100 ml of saline and inject them into the abdominal cavity respectively, and then inject another 100 ml of saline according to the patient's tolerance. The corresponding dose of immune checkpoint inhibitor and zoledronic acid was dissolved in 100 ml of saline and injected into the abdominal cavity.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, China
RECRUITINGDose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or maximal tolerance dose (MTD) in the Phase Ib stage
Side effects of drug or treatment that are serious enough (e. g. ≥Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity according to CTCAE 5.0 in ≥1/3) to prevent an increase in dose or level of that treatment. The MTD is defined as the previous dose level.
Time frame: 28 days after the last treatment
Objective response rate
Complete remission (CR): complete resolution of ascites and maintained for more than 4 weeks; complete disappearance of all target lesions; Partial remission (PR): the amount of CT-measured ascites decreased by more than 50% compared to pretreatment and the amount of ascites withdrawn again was less than 1/2 of the previous withdrawal and was maintained for more than 4 weeks; the sum of the diameters of all measurable target lesions was ≥30% below baseline; Objective Response Rate(ORR) = CR + PR
Time frame: 4 weeks after last treatment
Rates of Adverse events according to CTCAE 5.0 in overall subjects
Adverse events were graded and recorded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. A general physical examination, measurement of vital signs, laboratory safety evaluation, and documentation of relevant adverse events were performed at each visit during the treatment period.
Time frame: 3 months after the last treatment
Time for ascites control
If PD was judged and ascites was not re-punctured and drained, the time of this follow-up visit was used as the time of ascites control; if the patient had undergone puncture and drainage prior to the follow-up visit due to intolerance of ascites symptoms, the time of re-puncture was used as the time of ascites control.
Time frame: 1 year
Immune cell changes
Immune cell changes in ascites
Time frame: 4 weeks
Quality of Life Assessment
A quality of life score (QOL) for oncology patients was used. The quality of life score (QOL) of oncology patients contains 12 dimensions, including appetite, spirit, sleep, fatigue, pain, family understanding and cooperation, colleagues' understanding and cooperation (including leadership), own knowledge of cancer, attitude towards treatment, daily life, side effects of treatment, and facial expression, with the highest score of 5 and the lowest score of 1 for each dimension. Quality of life grading: Quality of life is scored out of 60, with 51-60 for good, 41-50 for better, 31-40 for average, 21-30 for poor, and \<20 for very poor quality of life.
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.