Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Two Guided Surgery Techniques for Free-end Implant Placement

Aula Dental Avanzada20 enrolled

Overview

This is a randomized multicenter clinical study that compares two static guided surgery techniques in free-end partial edentulism. The aim is to compare the accuracy obtained between dento-osseous supported and dento-mucosal supported surgical splints to place dental implants in posterior osseous ridges.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Dental Implant Bone Resorption

Interventions

Dental implant placementPROCEDURE

Placement of two dental implants in the jaw.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients who present to one of the two participating clinics with a posterior edentulous area starting from the second premolar. * Patients in whom the placement of dental implants is not contraindicated. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with hypersensitivities or allergies that contraindicate the intervention. * Presence of orofacial neurological symptoms. * Patients treated with bisphosphonates. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women undergoing contraceptive treatment. * Signs of infection in the surgical area. * Need for unconventional surgical procedures (e.g., split crest, vertical regeneration, block graft). * Lack of patient cooperation.

Locations (2)

Clínica Dental Esteve

Alicante, Alicante, Spain

RECRUITING

Clínica Dental Sánchez Nicolás

Cabezo de Torres, Murcia, Spain

RECRUITING

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by intraoral scan and planning software)

Three-dimensional deviations between the planned implant position and the actual postoperative implant position will be assessed. The deviations will be measured using an intraoral scanner (Medit i700®) and planning software (BlueSky Plan®). Units of measure: horizontal and vertical linear deviation (in millimeters), global deviation (in millimeters), and angular deviation (in degrees), evaluated at both implant entry and apex points.

Time frame: From enrollment to the end of surgery

Secondary Outcomes

Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by CBCT and planning software)

Three-dimensional deviations between the planned implant position and the actual postoperative implant position will be assessed. The deviations will be measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and planning software (BlueSky Plan®). Units of measure: horizontal and vertical linear deviation (in millimeters), global deviation (in millimeters), and angular deviation (in degrees), evaluated at both implant entry and apex points.

Time frame: From enrollment to the end of surgery

Central Contacts

Guillem Esteve-Pardo, PhD

CONTACT

+34 965215755 guillem@clinicaesteve.es

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.