This study aims to determine which method is more suitable for clinical application by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of serum AQP4-IgG detection using live cell CBA and fixed cell CBA methods, thereby improving the diagnostic accuracy of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).
This is a multi-center comparative real-world study on AQP4 Antibody Detection Methods Using Live Cell and Fixed Cell-Based Assay Technologies. This study aims to determine which method is more suitable for clinical application by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of serum AQP4-IgG detection using live cell CBA and fixed cell CBA methods, thereby improving the diagnostic accuracy of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). One hundred and twenty patients from 3 centres in China will be enrolled.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
120
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
Sensitivity (CI%), Specificity (CI%), Accuracy (CI%), PLR (CI%), NLR (CI%)
The sensitivity, 95% confidence interval (CI) for sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CI for specificity of AQP4 antibody detection methods using live cell and fixed cell-based assay technologies in NMOSD and suspected NMOSD, along with the corresponding results from various control groups and overall controls, are given.
Time frame: immediately
Agreement ,Cohen's kappa, Spearman correlation coefficient
The agreement ,Cohen's kappa, Spearman correlation coefficient of serum AQP4 antibody detection results using live CBA and fixed CBA.
Time frame: immediately
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.