Denosumab (Dmab) is a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, its withdrawal is associated with a rebound phenomenon associated with an unexpected increased risk of vertebral fractures. Defining the optimal strategy for Dmab withdrawal is critically needed. Investigator propose an open-label randomized superiority strategy trial to compare the 1-year lumbar densitometric efficacy of biomarkers-driven zoledronate (ZOL) infusion vs standardized ZOL treatment to mitigate rebound phenomenon.
Denosumab (Dmab) is a potent and validated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, its withdrawal, especially after reaching therapeutic target, is associated with a rebound phenomenon characterized by: (i) an increase in bone turnover markers levels usually within first 6 months off-treatment, (ii) a decrease in BMD, and (iii) an unexpected increased risk of (multiple) vertebral fractures. Although current experts' recommendations propose a post-Dmab bisphosphonates therapy (such as ZOL) to mitigate rebound phenomenon, the optimal strategy is still matter of debate. Data suggesting a protective effect with bisphosphonates (1 infusion of ZOL or weekly alendronate) are scarce, with discrepancies, and highlight that a substantial proportion of patients experiences rebound-related bone loss despite bisphosphonate therapy. Crosslaps, a bone turnover maker, are available for daily clinical practice and reflect the antiresorptive activity of anti-resorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates. Investigator hypothesize that monitoring crosslaps levels, can help to identify patients requiring more intensive bisphosphonate (additional ZOL infusion) therapy to control the post-Dmab rebound phenomenon. Investigator propose to compare 2 strategies for Dmab withdrawal in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a standard treatment control group treated with a single ZOL infusion versus a biomarker-guided ZOL group with an additional ZOL infusion in case of insufficient inhibition of bone resorption according to crosslaps.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
200
a first infusion of ZOL 5 mg, 6 months after denosumab withdrawal (= study start) and a second infusion when crosslaps levels reach 300 pg/mL, no later than month-12
a first infusion of ZOL 5 mg, 6 months after denosumab withdrawal (= study start), and potentially a rescue second infusion at month-12, in case unfavourable outcome (incident osteoporotic fractures) or high risk of unfavourable outcome
Amiens Hospital
Amiens, France
RECRUITINGBordeaux Hospital
Bordeaux, France
RECRUITINGCahors Hospital
Cahors, France
RECRUITINGDax Hospital
Dax, France
RECRUITINGLe Mans Hospital
Le Mans, France
RECRUITINGLille Hospital
Lille, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLimoges Hospital
Limoges, France
RECRUITINGMarseille Hsopital
Marseille, France
RECRUITINGMontpellier Hospital
Montpellier, France
RECRUITINGNice Hospital
Nice, France
RECRUITING...and 7 more locations
Maintain lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) after 1 year of ZOL
The proportion of patients who failed to maintain lumbar BMD after 1 year of ZOL according to the Least Significant Change (LSC) criterion
Time frame: 1 year after inclusion
Maintain hip bone mineral density (BMD) after 1 year of ZOL
The proportion of patients who failed to maintain hip BMD after 1 year of ZOL according to the Least Significant Change (LSC) criterion
Time frame: 1 year after inclusion
the changes in hip and lumbar BMD from baseline
the changes in hip and lumbar BMD from baseline to 1 year, and from year 1 to year 2 after ZOL, according to the Least Significant Change (LSC) criterion
Time frame: Day 0, 1 year after inclusion, 2 year after inclusion
the changes from baseline in bone turnover markers
Bone turnover markers is a composite measure derived from crosslaps, bone alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen, TRAP5b, dickkopf 1, sclerostin
Time frame: 1 year after inclusion, 2 year after inclusion
morphometric vertebral fractures
the number of morphometric vertebral fractures measured by vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) or X-rays, of clinical vertebral fractures and of clinical peripheral fractures
Time frame: 1 year after inclusion, 2 year after inclusion
Patients requiring a second ZOL
the proportion of patients requiring a second ZOL infusion across groups.
Time frame: 1 year after inclusion, 2 year after inclusion
Relation between biomarker values and densitometry evolution
the relation is defined by biomarker values (cross laps) and densitometry evolution measured bu osteodensitometry
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12 months after inclusion
Relation between biomarker values and appearance of new vertebral fracture
the relation is defined by biomarker values (cross laps) and appearance of new vertebral fracture measured by VFA or X-rays
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12 months after inclusion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.