Study in which a zinc oxide fixation device (a product that can help protect the skin) for catheters (polyurethane tubes inserted into a vein) will be tested to reduce catheter-related complications: catheter displacement, skin complications, phlebitis and pain..
Introduction: Midline catheters (MLC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are commonly used vascular access devices (VAD) in healthcare institutions where infusion therapies are required, and have been proven to have an optimal level of safety and efficacy for intravenous drug delivery. However, the insertion of these VADs has a number of potential associated complications (immediate, early and/or late), and proper fixation may reduce them. Hypothesis: Using a zinc oxide adhesive securement device (ASD) reduces the number of fixation-associated complications in MLC and PICC compared to a universal ASD with silicone adhesive. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of using a ASD with zinc oxide for post insertion fixation of MLC and PICC in hospitalised adult patients. Methodology: Randomised clinical study. Two randomised groups will be created before catheter cannulation. The control group will be cured with an ASD with acrylic adhesive (Grip-Lok® Ref.3300MWA) and the intervention group will be cured with ASD with zinc oxide (Grip-Lok® Ref.2200NUZA). Expected results: The investigators expect to reduce the number of complications related to the attachment of PICCs and MLCs in adult hospitalised patients following the protocolised placement of a ASD with zinc oxide during the first cure. Specifically, it is expected to reduce the number of catheter dislodgements, the number of medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSI) and the amount of phlebitis. Clinical implication: The study will help to improve decision making related to maintenance and care of VAD in order to reduce the main associated complications.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
400
The standard care consists of: * Application of hemostasis at the point of insertion for 2 minutes post puncture or until bleeding stops. * Fix with clear polyurethane dressing (3M®-1655 Tegaderm™ IV), cyanoacrylate glue (SecurePortIV®) and acrylic adhesive sutureless fixation device (3300MWA Grip-Lok®).
Alternative care consisted of: * Application of haemostasis at the insertion site for 2 minutes post-puncture or until cessation of bleeding. * Fixation with clear polyurethane dressing (3M®-1655 Tegaderm™ IV), cyanoacrylate glue (SecurePortIV®) and zinc oxide sutureless fixation device (2200NUZA Grip-Lok®).
The PICC lines used in the study will all be third-generation polyurethane and of the commercial brands: * PowerPICC™ 4, 5 and 6 Fr from BD * Maxflo expert™ 5 and 6 Fr from Vygon
The midline lines used in the study will be second or third generation polyurethane and of the commercial brands: * PowerMidline™ 4 Fr from BD * Arrow® Midline 4Fr from Arrow
All punctures will be performed under ultrasound guidance.
Arnau de Vilanova Hospital
Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
COMPLETEDNumber of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Percentage of participants with adverse events following cannulation of a midline or peripherally inserted central catheter after fixation with a zinc oxide sutureless fixation device.
Time frame: 7 days
Number of participants with altered skin under the sutureless fixation device assessed by observation (yes/no).
Percentage of participants with skin alterations under the sutureless fixation device after puncture of a midline or central venous catheter with the modified micro-Seldinger technique. Four examinations will be performed: post puncture, at 24 hours, at 72 hours and at 7 days, in which the puncture site will be visualized for signs of skin alterations and it will be noted whether they exist and what type (Hematoma, Skin Stripping, Tension Injury or Blister, Skin Tear, Irritant Contact Dermatitis, Allergic Contact Dermatitis, Maceration or Folliculitis).
Time frame: 7 days
Number of participants with post-treatment catheter displacement assessed by observation (yes/no).
Percentage of participants with catheter displacement after puncture of a midline or central venous catheter with the modified micro-Seldinger technique. Four cures will be performed: post puncture, at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days, where the puncture site will be visualized to check if the catheter is still in the same point or if it has been displaced.
Time frame: 7 days
Number of participants with post-treatment phlebitis assessed with the Maddox visual phlebitis rating scale.
Percentage of participants with phlebitis after puncture of a midline or central venous catheter with the modified micro-Seldinger technique. Four cures will be performed: post puncture, at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days, where the puncture site will be visualized to check for signs of phlebitis, according to the Maddox scale.
Time frame: 7 days
Number of participants with post-treatment pain in extremity assessed with the EVA scale.
Percentage of participants with pain in extremity after puncture of a midline or central venous catheter with the modified micro-Seldinger technique. Four cures will be performed: post puncture, at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days, where the patient will be asked what pain he/she feels in the extremity related to the catheter.
Time frame: 7 days
Padilla-Nula F Master of Science (MSc), Registred Nurse Certificated
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.