Post acne scars are formed as a result of very inflamed and nodulocystic acne. Most common type of acne scars are atrophic scars and they are further classified on the basis of depth and size of destruction into ice pick, boxcar and rolling scars. Evaulating the most efficacious, safe and affordable treatment option is the need of the hour. This study is going to compare the efficacy of microneedling with autologous platelet rich plasma verses microneedling with topical insulin in the treatment of post-acne atrophic scars as to find out the relatively more effective and safer treatment.
Acne vulgaris is a disease involving inflammation or blockage of pilosebaceous units. Post acne scars are formed as a result of very inflamed and nodulocystic acne. There are many procedures to treat post-acne scar including lasers, platelet rich plasma, fillers, chemical peeling, pulsed dye lasers, fractional CO2 lasers, subcision and punch techniques, but almost lead to additional scaring and pigmentation.The major purpose of our study is comparison of outcome of micro-needling and platelet rich plasma as opposed to combining it with topical in atrophic scars due to acne, as topical insulin is natural component of body, cheap, easy to use, minimally invasive and a new therapy for post-acne scars. No local study was found in literature research. Hence, any effect of this potentially very effective therapeutic modality needs to be investigated. OBJECTIVE: "To compare the outcome of microneedling with autologous platelet rich plasma verses microneedling with topical insulin in the treatment of post-acne atrophic scars". Material \& Methods: This randomized comarative study will be carried out in Outpatient Dermatology Department, Sheikh Zayed Hospital Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. Approval of the study has been taken from ethical review committee of the hospital.Data will be collected on prescribed form. Patient will be selected on basis of inclusion \& exclusion criteria. Informed consent will be taken from selected patients before data collection. Study will includes 60 patients which will be divided into 2 groups A \& B, 30 in each group. Group A will receive micro-needling with topical application of 2ml of human actrapid insulin. Group B will receive micro-needling with topical application of 2ml Platelet rich plasma. Face of the patient will be washed after 30 mints and patients will be strictly instructed regarding sun protection at least 1 day after the procedure. Blood glucose level will be checked prior to and 30 mints following procedure. At monthly interval for total 4 sessions and follow up visit will be after 2 months of last session.Data will be analyzed by SPSS v25.0. Chi-square test will be applied for qualitative variables and t-test will be used for quantitative variables.
Micro-needling with topical application of 2ml of human actrapid insulin once monthly for 4 months
Micro-needling with topical application of 2ml Platelet rich plasma once monthly for 4 months
Sheikh zayed Medical College and Hospital
Rahim Yar Khan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
To compare the outcome of microneedling with autologous platelet rich plasma verses microneedling with topical insulin in the treatment of post-acne atrophic scars
Efficacy will be assesssed clinically at each follow up visit. Final efficacy of each treatment will be determined at last follow up visit( i.e. at 6th month after start of treatment).The final efficacy will be divided into following groups on the basis of clinical resolution of disease: 1.Remission: It is defined as complete resolution of all scar leaving behind normal skin. 2.Improvement: It is defined as a more than 50% healing of scars ,as clinically measured by the surface area from the baseline. 3.No improvement: It is defined as less than a 50% improvement in the healing of scars, as measured clinically by the surface area from the baseline.
Time frame: Clinical assessment for efficacy will be done monthly for 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60