The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the success of two different bulk-fill restorative materials applied to teeth restored with atraumatic treatment at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups. The research seeks to address the following questions: Which bulk-fill restorative material is more effective in terms of clinical success? How does the clinical success of bulk-fill restorations change over time (3, 6, and 12 months)? How do the two materials compare in terms of functional, aesthetic, and biological outcomes? To what extent does the cavity size of teeth with interproximal caries, restored using atraumatic treatment, influence treatment success? In this study, asymptomatic teeth with aproximal caries in children aged 4-9 will be repaired using atraumatic treatment and assessed based on the Modified USPHS (United States Public Health Service) and Revised FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) is a minimally invasive approach developed for treating dental caries. This method involves removing carious tissue to the minimum extent possible using hand instruments and restoring the cavity with a biocompatible material, such as high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC). The fundamental principle of ART is to preserve the tooth's natural structure while providing a more comfortable and accessible treatment for patients. It offers a less stressful experience, particularly for children or patients with dental anxiety. Patients between the ages of 4-9 who meet ICDAS II (International Caries Detection and Assessment System) 4-5-6 criteria and need restoration of asymptomatic primary molars with unilateral or multifaceted carious cavities will be included. Volunteers will be randomly divided into two groups, and the treatments of primary molars will be completed using two different high-viscosity glass ionamer cement (HV-GIC). The teeth in all groups will be cleaned of decay using an excavator down to the affected dentin. After the cavity is prepared, the tooth is isolated using cotton pellets. Group 1: (RIVA Self Cure/HV, SDI, Australia) Apply a dentin conditioner (Riva Conditioner, SDI, Australia) to the prepared dentin surface for 10 seconds, then rinse thoroughly with water and gently blot dry. Ensure the tooth surface remains moist. The tooth will be restored with RIVA Self Cure (SDI, Australia) capsule form by the manufacturer's instructions, and the restoration will be covered with a sealing agent (RIVA Coat, SDI, Australia) Group 2: (STELA , SDI, Australia) STELA Primer (SDI, Australia) to the prepared cavity surface using a disposable brush applicator and leave it for 5 seconds. After drying the teeth, place the syringe into the mixer and follow the manufacturer's instructions for mixing. Apply the mixed STELA restorative material directly into the prepared cavity. The restoration is completed following the manufacturer's recommendations. Before the procedure, demographic and dental data of the child volunteer, such as age, gender, brushing frequency, and number of teeth treated, will be recorded. The US Public Health Service criteria (retention, anatomical form, surface roughness, secondary caries, marginal discoloration, and marginal integrity) and Modified FDI criteria will be used for clinical evaluation of restorations. The restorations will be evaluated clinically and radiologically at baseline 3., 6. and 12. months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
127
Restoration using Bulk-fill flowable self-cured composite
Restoration Using High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Çanakkale, Kepez, Turkey (Türkiye)
Change form 3 months to 12 months regarding
alpha: The general contour of the restorations follows the contour bravo: the general contour of the restoration does not follow the contour of the tooth charlie: The restoration has an overhang does
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Marginal adaptation"
alpha: Explorer does not catch or has one-way catch when drawn across the restoration/tooth interface bravo: explorer falls into crevice drawn across the restoration/tooth interface charlie: Dentin or base is exposed along the margin
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Surface roughness"
alpha: the surface of the restoration does not have any surface defects bravo: the surface of the restoration has minimal surface defects charlie: the surface of the restoration has severe surface defects
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Marginal staining"
alpha: there is no discoloration between the restorations and tooth bravo: there is discoloration on less than half of the circumferential margin charlie: there is discoloration on more than half of the circumferential margin
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Retention"
alpha: intact bravo: chipped/loss of material charlie: complete loss of crown
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Incisal wear"
alpha: intact bravo: wear of occlusal surface without tooth surface exposure charlie: wear of occlusal surface with tooth surface exposure
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
Functional properties according to revised FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Functional properties: F2: Marginal adaptation measured by visual examination, short air drying, 250 μm probe. F3:Proximal contact point measured by visual examination and 25/50/100 μm blades. F4: Form and contour measured by visual examination. F5: Occlusion and occlusal wear measured by visual examination and articulation paper. Method of aggregation is frequency and percentage. Measuring unit is scoring system (Ordinal, scores 1-5). (1) Clinically excellent. (sufficient). (5) Clinically poor (entirely insufficient).
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
Biological properties according to revised FDI criteria
Biological properties: B1: Caries at restoration margin (CAR) measured by visual examination, short air drying, and 250 μm probe. B2: Dental hard tissue defects at restoration margin measured by visual examination. B3: Postoperative hypersensitivity reported by patient and pulp status tested with cold stimulus. Method of aggregation is frequency and percentage. Measuring unit is scoring system (Ordinal, scores 1-5). (1) Clinically excellent. (sufficient). (5) Clinically poor (entirely insufficient).
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
Aesthetic properties according to revised FDI criteria
Aesthetic properties: A1: Surface luster and surface texture measured by visual examination and short air drying. A2: Marginal staining measured by visual examination and short air drying. A3: color match measured by visual examination. Method of aggregation is frequency and percentage. Measuring unit is scoring system (Ordinal, scores 1-5). (1) Clinically excellent. (sufficient). (5) Clinically poor (entirely insufficient).
Time frame: 3-month,6-month,12 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.