Hypophosphatemia is a common disorder in critically ill patients, appearing in 15-35% of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions. Its reasons are multifactorial, including sepsis, refeeding syndrome, and continuous renal replacement therapy. Hypophosphatemia is generally accepted as a predictor of poor outcomes, such as prolonged ventilation and higher mortality. However, conflicting evidence exists and several works demonstrated no effect on length of ventilation, nor mortality. We have recently demonstrated no effect of hypophosphatemia on mortality and length of ventilation. However, both parameters were affected by energy delivery to the patient, with higher energy delivery associated with lower mortality and longer length of ventilation, suggesting a complex interaction between energy delivery to the patient, hypophosphatemia appearance, and patient outcomes. This raised hypothesis that hypophosphatemia is a marker of recovery, as in fulminant hepatic failure, or recovery after hepatectomy. Phosphate is mainly an intracellular anion, with only 1% of its total body amount is extracellular. It is absorbed from the small intestine, mainly at the jejunum, both through passive para-cellular and active trans-cellular process. Phosphate is excreted in the urine, after being filtered in the glomeruli, and reabsorbed mainly in the proximal tubule (less than 10% of the reabsorption occurs in the distal nephron), by sodium-phosphate co-transporters. Phosphate regulation in the body is complex. It is regulated by vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23). Therefore, phosphate regulation is affected both from intestine dysfunction and kidney injury. Although hyperphosphatemia in various kidney injury is well described, the effect of kidney function regarding phosphate excretion in critically ill patients with hypophosphatemia has been scarcely described. French and Bellomo described 7 patients who had decreased phosphate kidney reabsorption during hypophosphatemia. Charrone et. al demonstrated increased phosphate excretion after IV phosphate infusion to 47 critically ill patients with hypophosphatemia. Dickerson et. al demonstrated higher rates of hypophosphatemia in 20 thermally injured patients (compared to 20 multiple trauma patients) despite greater phosphate delivery through nutrition, along with increased (although insignificant) phosphate urinary excretion in this group. This might suggest that increased renal phosphate loss has a role in hypophosphatemia development. Better understanding these processes is important, with regard to the effect of nutritional support and hypophosphatemia effects on patients' outcomes. This study aims to describe urinary phosphate excretion in critically ill patients with regard to kidney function, phosphate serum level, and phosphate intake.
Data collection We will document the following data for each patient, for maximum of five days from admission: * Demographic data, including age; sex, height, weight, admission reason to ICU. * Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score (24 hours after ICU admission) * Daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and SOFA components. * Daily Ventilation status * Daily vasopressor requirement * Daily Renal replacement therapy (if any) * Daily urine volume * Daily fluid balance - including daily fluid input and output * Daily 6 hours urine collection, with documentation of collection volume, urine creatinine, and urine electrolytes. Specimens from the first two days of admission will be sent to laboratory analysis only after the patient is admitted for more than 48 hours. * Calculation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on urine collection findings. * Calculation of phosphate excretion amount based on urine collection findings - both maximal phosphate tubular reabsorption rate (TmP) and Fractional Excretion of phosphate (FePi). * Daily serum phosphate and calcium levels * Daily phosphate intake - from enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, and supplemental (enteral and parenteral). * For the last 60 patients - a single measurement of PTH and vitamin D. * Patient outcomes: ICU length of stay; Hospital length of stay; Length of ventilation; Ventilator free days at 28 days; Mortality - at ICU, during hospital admission, and at 28 \& 90 days.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
205
Rabin Medcial Center
Petah Tikva, Israel
90 day mortality
Mortality within 90 days of ICU admission.
Time frame: 90 days from ICU admission
28-Ventilation free days
Number of ventilator free days within 28 days of ICU admission
Time frame: 28 days of ICU admission
ICU Length of stay
ICU admission duration
Time frame: 90 days from ICU admissino
hospital length of stay
hospital admission duration
Time frame: up to 90 days after ICU admission
ICU and hospital mortality
whether mortality happened during ICU/hospital admissino
Time frame: 90 days from ICU admissino
Differences in Glomerular Filtration Rate
Differences in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (ml/min)
Time frame: Daily during first five days of ICU admission
Maximal tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TmP)
Differences in Maximal tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TmP) (mg/min) will be examined in each group and between groups.
Time frame: Daily during first five days of ICU admission
Phosphate Balance
Differences in phosphate balance (mg) will be examined between the groups
Time frame: Daily during first five days of ICU admission
Ratio of Maximal Tubular Reabsorption rate to Glomerular Filtartaion Rate (Tmp/GFR)
Differences in the ratio Tmp/GFR (mg/ml), and daily phosphate balance will be examined in each group and between groups.
Time frame: Daily during first five days of ICU admission
PTH level and Vitamin D level
Differences in PTH (ng/ml) and Vitamin D (IU/ml) between groups
Time frame: One measurement, during first five days of ICU admission
caloric intake
Differences in the caloric intake provided (Kcal/day) will be examined between the groups
Time frame: daily measurement during first five days of ICU admission
timing of nutritional support initiation
timing of nutritional support initiation will be compared between groups.
Time frame: within first five days of ICU admission
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.