Rationale: Fluorouracil (5-FU) are broadly used in chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of cancers. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a major enzyme in the 5-FU metabolism pathway. Patients with a partial or complete DPD deficiency have a strongly reduced capacity to metabolize 5-FU which may result in severe or life-threatening toxicity when treated with a standard dose of fluoropyrimidines. A partial DPD deficiency is present in 3-5% of the North American and European population. DPD deficiency is most often caused by genetic variants in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD). The four DPYD variants considered most clinically relevant and with statistically significant association with severe toxicity are DPYD\*2A (rs3918290, c.1905+1G\>A, IVS14+1G\>A), c.2846A\>T (rs67376798, D949V), c.1679T\>G (rs55886062, DPYD\*13, I560S), and c.1236G\>A (rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3). Prospective testing for DPD deficiency can prevent severe toxicity or mortality. Several methods have been proposed for detection of DPD deficiency, based on either genotyping of DPYD or measurement of the DPD phenotype. However, DPD deficiency is not the only factor associated with variable concentrations of 5-FU. 5-FU displays an exposure-response relationship between systemic exposure and clinical events. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) or pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided dosing of 5-FU is also considered as an alternative to ensure an acceptable exposure of 5-FU. Upfront DPD screening combined with PK guided 5-FU dosing as a tool to personalize treatment has never been studied before. In this study, we aim to investigate the PK of 5-FU for the 4 most common DPYD genetic variants, in order to better define a safe starting dose for 5-FU in DPD deficient patients. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to investigate the clearance of 5-FU for the 4 most common DPYD gene variants compared to the clearance of 5-FU in DPYD wild-type patients. The secondary objectives of this study are to determine the toxicity incidence and the extent of DPD deficiency as measured by Uracil Loading Test (ULT) for the 4 most common DPYD variants, to evaluate the safety and tolerability of reduced starting dose of 5-FU in patients with DPD deficiency, to demonstrate the ability to achieve a target AUC range, to establish that PK-guided 5-FU dosing decreases the incidence of 5-FU related toxicities, to establish the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the DPYD genotyping test and to optimize the sampling moment of 5-FU in order to minimize patient discomfort related to TDM procedures Study design: The study is designed as a single-centre prospective inception cohort study. All patients will be screened for DPD deficiency by DPYD genotyping and separated into two groups; DPYD common variants and control group. Patients with DPYD wild-type but who experience CTC grade 3-4 toxicity will also be included in this study as a toxicity group. Patients will be tested with an oral ULT to identify their DPD phenotype and measured an endogenous U/DHU ratio. Therapeutic drug monitoring will be performed to follow-up patients' 5-FU plasma concentration after start chemotherapy treatment. 5-FU plasma concentrations will be monitored until a steady state AUC of 20-30 mg.h/L is reached or maximum 4 treatment cycles is reached. Study population: All gastrointestinal cancer patients aged 18 years and older who are scheduled to receive treatment with fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy. Treatment: All patients will be treated with a standard chemotherapy regimen for their respective gastrointestinal cancer. Only 5-FU based regimens will be considered for this study. Patients will receive adjusted 5-FU doses based on their condition, including body surface area, gene activity score or DPD status, and steady state AUC from the previous dose, until their AUC reaches a target range. Patients will continue to receive regular treatment, as long as needed and/or tolerated. Main study parameters: The primary outcome of the study is the clearance of 5-FU at steady state (Clss) measured in ml/min. Among cancer patients treated with 5-FU, we will compare the variation in clearance between the four common DPYD variant allele carriers and DPYD wild-type carriers. The secondary study parameters are the incidence of 5-FU related toxicities, U/DHU ratio, DPD phenotype (EM, IM, and PM), 5-FU doses, dosage adjustment and time to reach target AUC (cycle number).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
Patients without common DPYD variant will be used for this study as a control group. Patients will receive the first 5-FU-dose based on their body surface area. 5-FU plasma concentrations will be measured during cycle 1. If patients experience CTC grade 3-4 toxicity, DPYD sequencing will be performed. Dose reduction or discontinuation of 5-FU therapy will be considered according to the physician's discretion. Patients with a DPYD variant will receive the first dose based on their body surface area and gene activity score according to Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline or according to the physician's descretion. Patients' blood sample will be collected and the 5-FU dose for the next cycle will be calculated according to a modified algorithm of Goirand or according to the pharmacist's discretion. 5-FU plasma concentrations will be monitored until a steady state AUC of 20-30 mg.h/L is reached.
Isala Hospital Zwolle
Zwolle, Netherlands
5-Fluorouracil pharmacokinetics
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the clearance of 5-FU at steady state (Clss) for the 4 most common DPYD gene variants, compared to the clearance of 5-FU at steady state (Clss) in DPYD wild-type patients and the clearance of 5-FU at steady state (Clss) in assumed DPYD wild-type patients with early grade 3-4 toxicity in order to better define a safe starting dose for 5-FU in DPD deficient patients.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment cycle 4 (the length of each cycle is 14 days)
5-FU dose needed to reach target AUC
The absolute 5-FU dose in mg, needed to reach a target AUC of 20-30 mg.h/L The dose range in each DPYD subgroup will be determined
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment cycle 4 (the length of each cycle is 14 days)
DPD phenotyping result
The extent of DPD deficiency as measured by the uracil/dihydrouracil (U/DHU) ratio after oral intake of 1000mg uracil (uracil loading test). A ratio above the threshold value of 2.4 is considered as DPD deficient. The range of U/DHU ratio's will be determined for each DPYD subgroup.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment cycle 4 (the length of each cycle is 14 days)
Safety and tolerability
The safety and tolerability of a reduced starting dose of 5-FU in gastrointestinal cancer patients with DPD deficiency as measured by CTC-AE v5 toxicity grading. The number of patients in each DPYD subgroup with CTC-AE grade 3 or higher will be determined.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment cycle 4 (the length of each cycle is 14 days)
Number of cycles to reach target AUC
The number of cycles needed to achieve a target AUC range of 20-30 mg.h/L after an adjusted 5-FU dose
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment cycle 4 (the length of each cycle is 14 days)
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of DPYD genotyping
Calculation of the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the DPYD genotyping test, based on both the incidence of unexpected CTC-AE toxicity \> grade 3 and the detection of rare DPYD variants detected with DNA sequencing in wild type genotyped patients.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment cycle 4 (the length of each cycle is 14 days)
Optimization of 5-FU blood sampling
Estimation of the most convenient sampling moment (in hours) after start of 5-FU continuous infusion, in order to minimize patient discomfort related to TDM procedures
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment cycle 4 (the length of each cycle is 14 days)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.