Two Dutch guidelines (Stroke and Cardiovascular Risk Management) provide conflicting advice on optimal statin treatment in older patients. In the SAFEST-cohort, the investigators will assess the impact of continuing versus discontinuing a statin in frail individuals aged 70 and above with a recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) on their health-related quality of life and MACE free survival during a two-year follow-up period.
The stroke incidence strongly increases with age.Many of the older individuals that suffered a stroke will have to live with stroke sequelae and will need lifelong care, either at home or in a nursing facility. Hence, secondary prevention strategies are of the highest importance. Statins are used for the prevention of subsequent cardiovascular events in ischemic stroke and TIA patients. The efficacy of statin therapy has been firmly established in middle-aged stroke patients. However, despite the high prevalence of stroke in older people, the evidence for the efficacy of statin therapy in older individuals that suffered an ischemic stroke or TIA is sparse. This primarily arises from the underrepresentation of older patients in statin trials. In a recent meta-analysis, it was found that in people aged 70 and above, statin use lowered the annual incidence of major vascular events with approximately one percent. However, the trials in this meta-analysis mostly included fit, non-frail older adults. Frailty is a geriatric condition characterized by an increased vulnerability to external stressors, linked to adverse outcomes, including premature mortality. A considerable proportion of the older population is frail. However, since trials that include older individuals often focus on fit, non-frail older adults, there is currently no evidence for the most effective treatment strategy in the frail older group. While it might be tempting to extrapolate the benefits of statin therapy from younger patients to frail older patients, it is vital to acknowledge the considerable disparities between these groups. Firstly, frail older stroke survivors may not have a life-expectancy longer than the time to benefit. Secondly, due to the high percentage of polypharmacy in frail older people, this patient group has a higher risk for the occurrence of drug-drug interactions and adverse effects, which have the ability to significantly affect the quality of life. The limited body of evidence regarding the effectiveness of statins in the older population, combined with their higher susceptibility to side effects and drug interactions, results in uncertainty for patients as well as for doctors and policymakers when deciding how to treat this patient group.This uncertainty is clearly reflected in the two Dutch guidelines ("Herseninfarct en Hersenbloeding" and "Cardiovascular Risk Management (CVRM)" respectively), providing conflicting advice on optimal statin treatment in older patients. The investigators hypothesize that in frail older patients with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA, discontinuing statins will increase health-related quality of life (HrQoL) without a substantial decrease in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) free survival, which includes cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke. In this prospective cohort study, no intervention will be implemented. Participants will be followed for two years (and for the patients included in the first years of the inclusion period - three). During this time, data is collected including questionnaires on quality of life, occurrence of MACE or falls, and possible changes in statin treatment.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
300
Statin use
Flevoziekenhuis
Almere Stad, Netherlands
RECRUITINGAmsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
RECRUITINGCatharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
RECRUITINGIsala Klinieken
Zwolle, Netherlands
RECRUITINGHealth-Related Quality of Life (HrQoL)
This will be measured using the PROMIS-10 scale scores (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health), including global mental health and global physical health subscales. Measurements at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months. months.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) free survival
Classical 3-point MACE (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) and non-cardiovascular death. Measurements at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months
Functional outcome
This will be assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), with scores ranging from 0 to 6 (lower scores indicating better function).
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Cognition
This will be measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 30 (best) or the Telephone version of the MoCA (TMoCA) with scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 22 (best)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Number of falls
Falls, measured using the falls calender. Participant returns the fall calender every 3 months.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Time to first fall
Falls, measured using the falls calender. Participant returns the fall calender every 3 months.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
General quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L
General QoL, measured by the EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), with scores ranging from 0-100, the higher, the better.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Societal costs
Societal costs measured by The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey - Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS) (questions 23 - 37)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Cardiovascular risk status
This will be assessed by collecting vital signs (height, weight, and blood pressure) and lipid levels. The exact way how to combine these factors into one risk status will be determined.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.