The Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Value of FAPI PET in Pleural Mesothelioma

Overview

Seventy (N=70) patients with suspected pleural mesothelioma (PM) lesions referred to pleural biopsy will be recruited, and undergo an additional FAPI PET/CT at primary staging. The FAPI PET/CT results will be compared to conventional imaging (including FDG PET/CT). The diagnostic accuracy will be determined with histopathology as reference standard. For patients undergoing anticancer treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, other treatment), an additional FAPI PET/CT and an additional FDG PET/CT will be conducted after the study subjects have completed 2-3 series of anticancer treatment. The feasabilitiy of FAPI PET/CT in response evaluation will be investigated. All study specific analyzes will be blinded and will not influence the patient management / treatment.

A new and promising PET tracer has been developed: Gallium-68 labelled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI). FAPI binds to fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a type II transmembrane protein, which is expressed and upregulated in cancer associated fibroblasts. FAPI PET/CT has been superior to FDG PET/CT regarding tumor detection rate in multiple cancer entities. When evaluating the clinical value of FAPI PET/CT compared to conventional imaging, including FDG PET/CT, studies have shown that FAPI PET/CT led to a revised staging in up to 25-30% of cancer patients, and a revised treatment in up to 20-30% of patients. The clinical interest in FAPI extends beyond the use as a diagnostic tool, as the 68Ga-isotope can be replaced by a β-emitting isotope, e.g., 177-Lu or 90-Y, enabling radionuclide therapy of FAPI-avid cancers. FAP-immunohistochemistry (FAP-IHC) studies in PM have shown promising results, and - as PM is of mesodermal origin, FAP-overexpression has been observed in the cancer cells themselves. To date, only two clinical FAPI PET study in PM has been conducted. In these studies uptake values were significantly higher for FAPI PET compared to FDG PET regarding primary tumors and lymph node metastases. Moreover, FAPI PET/CT led to upstaging in some of the patients compared to FDG PET/CT. Based on pathological studies, implementation of FAPI PET/CT could be particularly beneficial in sarcomatoid and biphasic PM subtypes, which are characterized by aggressive growth and a worse prognosis compared to the epithelioid subtypes, however, non-epithelioid subtypes are underrepresented in FAPI PET studies to date. PM in most cases is diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease and surgery with pleurectomy/decortication is only indicated in select cases with localized disease (approx. 30% of patients with the epithelioid subtype). Therefore, most patients undergo palliative treatment with either chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy. Considering the inherent limitations and difficulties for CT based response evaluation tools in PM, experts argue that response assessment using FDG PET/CT, i.e., PET Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), could be an even more sensitive tool in PM compared to anatomical imaging response tools. To date, there are no studies evaluating the feasibility of FAPI PET for response assessment in PM. The study is a prospective explorative study complying with the Standard for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) criteria where 70 patients with suspected PM are recruited. An additional FAPI PET/CT will be performed as a study specific procedure at primary staging within 4 weeks of the primary staging FDG PET/CT and prior to the pleural biopsy. All included study subjects will undergo this additional primary staging FAPI PET/CT. Patients with benign histology will not receive any further study related procedures - unless they are re-recruited at a later time point. For the proportion of study subjects treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy (anticancer treatment), as part of common clinical practice, additional study specific FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT will be conducted after completing 2-3 series of anticancer treatment, that is 3 series of chemotherapy or 2 series of immunotherapy. The study specific procedures will be conducted in addition to common clinical practice and will not interfere with or delay the routine diagnostic workup or treatment. The results of the study specific procedures will not be available to the patient or the treating physicians (blinded) and will not interfere with planned treatment/diagnostics.