Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) have emerged as an effective primary endoscopic therapy for weight loss. While ESG recapitulates the configuration of a gastric sleeve, it has not yet been shown to achieve as robust weight loss outcomes compared to the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A major difference between ESG and LSG is that the former does not involve the gastric fundus and therefore does not lead to decrease in fasting plasma ghrelin after procedure. Recently, a new endoscopic technique involving the ablation of the gastric fundus has been developed, showing promising results with a reduction in fasting plasma ghrelin levels and a mean total body weight loss of 7.7%. Combining endoscopic gastric fundus mucosal ablation with ESG could potentially enhance the weight loss effects of ESG while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. This pilot study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and physiological effects of combining endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with fundal mucosal ablation (ESG-FUMA) in obese patients eligible for endoscopic bariatric therapies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
10
Mucosal ablation around the gastric fundus is initially performed using a hybrid argon plasma coagulation (H-APC) probe, following a submucosal saline injection, until ablation coagulum is visible. Subsequently, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is performed using a full-thickness endoscopic suturing device (Overstitch, Apollo). This is done in a standard manner, employing 6-8 permanent full-thickness sutures along the greater curvature of the stomach in a running plication, starting from the angular incisura and extending proximally while sparing the fundus. Hemostasis is carefully checked and confirmed before the procedure is completed.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shatin, Hong Kong
RECRUITINGBody weight
Weight change compared to baseline
Time frame: baseline, 1,3,6,12 months
Adverse events
Adverse events relating to endoscopic intervention, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time frame: within 30 days of procedure
Technical success rate
successful completion of endoscopic procedures
Time frame: 1 day
Serum ghrelin levels
Serum ghrelin levels compared to baseline
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
Blood pressure
Blood pressure and anti-hypertensive medication use compared to baseline
Time frame: baseline, 1,3,6,12 months
Lipid profile
Lipid profile compared to baseline
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
Pain scale after procedure
measured by visual analogue scale (0:no pain - 10:worst pain)
Time frame: 3 days
Change in Quality of Life
measured by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire - (score 0:worst - 100:best)
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
Gastric emptying symptoms
measured by gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) - (0:best - 45:worst)
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
Eating behaviors
measured by Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) - (21:worst - 84:best)
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
Fasting glucose level
levels compared to baseline
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
Insulin level
levels compared to baseline
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
HbA1c level
levels compared to baseline
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
hepatic steatosis index
level compared to baseline
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
NAFLD fibrosis
NAFLD fibrosis scores compared to baseline (F0: no liver fibrosis - F4: significant liver fibrosis)
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.