This prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AVELI for reducing cellulite and fibrotic tissue in patients undergoing High-Definition Liposculpture, exploring if AVELI improves the aesthetic outcomes, and reduced the clinically evident cellulite and/or fibrosis. The main questions this study seeks to answer are: * Does AVELI safely reduce cellulite and fibrotic tissue without causing serious adverse events? * How effective is AVELI in improving patient-reported outcomes and aesthetic appearance? Through this study, the study team aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AVELI. The study procedures include: * Baseline data collection of sociodemographic variables. Data collection of surgical variables, adverse events, and satisfaction scores. * All patients will undergo the standardized High-Definition Liposculpture technique, with AVELI applied to all identified cellulite and/or fibrosis release. * Photographic and 3D imaging preoperatively and at follow-ups (1, 3, 6, and 9 months).
Study design: Interventional prospective cohort study, non-randomized, non-controlled, no masking. Ethical Considerations: * IRB Approval: The study will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki principles and will be approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). * Informed Consent: Participants will be provided comprehensive information about study procedures, risks, and benefits, and written consent will be obtained. * Data Confidentiality: All participant data will be anonymized and securely stored. Eligible patients will be approached, the study aims, objectives, procedures, and voluntary participation will be explained. In case patient consent to participate, a written informed consent will be signed. The patients will be comprehensively evaluated by the plastic surgeon, and assigned to a group based on their individual physical evaluation findings: Cellulite Group, Fibrosis Group, Fibrosis and Cellulite Group. Study Locations: * Dhara Clinic (Bogota, Colombia) * Miami Aesthetic Center (Miami, FL - USA) Data Collection: * Demographic, Clinical, and surgical variables are going to be collected in an Excel-based password protected database. * Other procedure related variables are also going to be collected in the same database, including pain assessment in the immediate postoperative, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, time to discharge, and complications \& management. * 3D photographic analysis will be employed to analyze preoperative, and postoperative images at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months post procedure. Then the changes will be objectively compared using Quantificare Photographical Software, through the different timepoints to evaluate the objective contour defects and postoperative improvement changes. * Satisfaction Scores: Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) evaluated at least 3 months postoperatively.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
Minimally invasive method for selectively identifying and manually releasing specific septa responsible for causing cellulite depressions.
Miami Aesthetic
Miami, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGDhara Clinic
Bogotá, DC, Colombia
RECRUITINGSerious Adverse Events Incidence
Incidence of intervention-related serious adverse events (SAE). SAE were defined as any adverse events that met one or more of the following criteria: required hospital care, required additional medical intervention or treatment, produced any disability, were classified as life-threatening, or resulted in the death of the patient.
Time frame: 30 days
Patient Satisfaction Scores
Patient-reported satisfaction scores measured using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) for the reduction of cellulite and/or fibrosis. The GAIS is a standardized scale used primarily in cosmetic and dermatological treatments to assess the overall aesthetic improvement of a patient after a procedure. It consist of three questions: * how do you feel about your appearance after surgery? Possible answers: Very much improved, much improved, slightly improved, no change. * Are you satisfied with the surgery? Very satisfied, satisfied, not satisfied. * Would you recommend the surgical procedure? Possible answers: Yes, perhaps, no.
Time frame: 6 months
Photographic aesthetic outcomes analysis
Through 3D camera photos and photographic software, an analysis will objectively calculate the differences between preoperative contour defects (fibrosis and/or cellulite) and postoperative improvement.
Time frame: One month, three months, six months, and nine months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.