Background: Eating Disorders (ED) are mental health conditions, characterized by pathological behaviors toward food intake or a persistent obsession with weight control. EDs have a high prevalence among pre-adolescents in developed countries and pose a significant economic burden. Preventive interventions targeting at-risk populations for ED have proven effective. The use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) facilitates access to larger population groups while also reducing costs. Objectives: * Develop and validate a universally applied intervention (PRETA), mediated by ICTs, to reduce eating-disorder risk and modifiable risk factors, through cultural adaptation and adjustment of the POtsdam Prevention at Schools (POPS) Program to preadolescents. * Assess the efficacy of the PRETA Program through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). * Evaluate the efficiency of the PRETA Program from a social perspective. Methodology The PRETA Program uses 9 online sessions with interactive activities for pre- adolescents, plus education for their families and teachers. Its content includes addressing key factors in the development of ED, such as eating habits, beauty standards, and media literacy, as well as activities aimed at strengthening psychological dimensions (self-esteem, emotional regulation, problem-solving, psychological flexibility, and resilience) and social skills, including communication styles and distinguishing between jokes and bullying. The study involves schools being randomly assigned to either the PRETA Program or regular health activities. The effect of the intervention will be evaluated 3 months after its start.
A matched-pair cluster random allocation will be used, with schools being asigned as clusters. Six schools will be assigned to each group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,068
The intervention adopts a multicomponent approach, addressing three agents in the prevention and management of eating disorders: parents, teachers and students. 1. Intervention with parents: Parents will receive specific materials, including an informative guide on early identification of warning signs, promoting healthy lifestyle habits, and fostering effective communication with their children. 2. Intervention with teachers: A two-hour in-person session will train teachers on platform use and provide tools for eating disorder prevention through role-playing techniques. Online resources will complement the training, while researchers ensure adherence via weekly follow-ups and parent reminders. 3. e-Preta program: The intervention for minors is delivered through an online platform, structured into 9 sessions of 45 minutes each, over 3 months. Weekly, platform-guided activities are proposed for classroom use with minimal teacher interaction, along with voluntary at-home activities.
Servicio de Evaluación y Planificación del Servicio Canario de Salud
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
RECRUITINGChildren's Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT-26) Questionnaire score
The ChEAT is an adaptation of the EAT-26 for children is a 26 items scored on a 6-option Likert scale. It is a validated, self-administered questionnaire in Spanish for children aged 8 and older, with a reading level of 5th grade. The questionnaire focuses on identifying issues related to a persistent concern with food, eating patterns, and abnormal attitudes for this age group. The total score is obtained by summing all items, resulting in a range from 0 to 78 points. A total score above 20 points may indicate a possible presence of ED
Time frame: Before and inmediately after the intervention
Evaluation of body image measured with the Adapted Contour Drawing Rating Scale (A-CDRS) visual analog scale.
It consists of 9 male and 9 female figure outlines that increase in size as the score increases. This scale measures the level of satisfaction with one's own body image. The degree of satisfaction or discrepancy index is obtained by calculating the difference between the desired and perceived images. A difference of 2 points is associated with body image disturbance. Age-appropriate images adapted for children aged 10 to 13 years will be used.
Time frame: Before and inmediately after the intervention
Body dissatisfaction, bulimia, and drive for thinness measured with the Spanish version of the Eating Disorder Inventory-2 (EDI-2).
The Eating Disorders Inventory-2 is a self-report instrument consisting of 91 items assessing psychological and behavioral traits associated with eating disorders, primarily anorexia and bulimia nervosa, across 11 different subscales. The response scale is a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (always). The total score is obtained by summing all responses; a higher score indicates a greater presence of the trait.
Time frame: Before and inmediately after the intervention
Internalization of the current aesthetic model and media pressure using the Spanish version of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4
The original instrument includes 5 subscales; however, in this study, only the subscales related to body image internalization will be applied: the current aesthetic model based on thinness and the current aesthetic model based on athletic build (10 items), and the pressure to meet beauty ideals promoted by the media (4 items). Items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 "completely disagree" to 5 "completely agree." The score is calculated by summing all items; a higher score indicates greater internalization and influence of the aesthetic body model.
Time frame: Before and inmediately after the intervention
Evaluation of global self-esteem measured with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
consists of 10 items that assess global self-esteem in adolescents, including elements focused on feelings of self-respect and self-acceptance. The first 5 items are positively worded and scored from 4 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree); the last 5 items are negatively worded and scored from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). The total score is obtained by summing all item responses. A score above 30 indicates high self-esteem, a score between 26 and 29 is considered medium self-esteem, and a score below 25 reflects low self-esteem.
Time frame: Before and inmediately after treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.