Functional impairment in the upper extremities is one of the most common sequelae in stroke patients. It significantly limits the patients' grasping-releasing functions and, consequently, their activities of daily living (ADL), such as eating - drinking, dressing, and self-care. Action Observation Training (AOT), performed by observing simple actions frequently used in ADL and then imitating the observed actions, reduces interhemispheric inhibition and allows the elimination of impairments in upper extremity motor function and relearning of functions in chronic stroke patients. This study aims to investigate the effects of telerehabilitation and face-to-face AOT application on upper extremity functions, activities of daily living, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients and to question whether there are differences between the short- and long-term effects of these two AOT applications.
Stroke is defined as a neurological picture caused by focal damage to the central nervous system due to vascular problems such as cerebral infarction or intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Functional impairment in the upper extremities is one of the most common sequelae in stroke patients. It significantly limits the patients' grasping-releasing functions and, consequently, their activities of daily living (ADL), such as eating - drinking, dressing, and self-care. Action Observation Therapy (AOT), which is performed by observing simple actions frequently used in ADL and then imitating the observed actions, is a rehabilitation approach used in recent years to improve upper limb functions in the rehabilitation of stroke and various neurological diseases. It is stated that AOT reduces interhemispheric inhibition and allows the elimination of impairments in motor function and relearning of functions. Telerehabilitation is the remote delivery of rehabilitation services through telecommunication technology. Telerehabilitation provides important advantages, such as difficulty transferring the patient to the health center, where the rehabilitation process takes a long time, travel time, and travel costs in stroke patients. In the literature review, no study was found comparing the effect of the AOT with the telerehabilitation method and face-to-face application on the patient's upper extremity functions, activities of daily living, and quality of life in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic stroke. In addition, to our knowledge, there is no study examining the long-term effects of AOT, which has been the subject of a limited number of studies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
26
Patients received general physiotherapy in addition to action observation therapy (AOT) via telerehabilitation method for 5 weeks, 3 days a week. AOT was applied to patients as a single session per day and lasted 30 minutes. General physiotherapy session was applied face to face for 45 minutes.
Patients received general physiotherapy in addition to action observation therapy (AOT) via face-to-face telerehabilitation method for 5 weeks, 3 days a week. AOT was applied to patients as a single session per day and lasted 30 minutes. General physiotherapy session was applied face-to-face for 45 minutes.
Mustafa KAVAK
Karabük, Karabük Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
Spasticity
Spasticity will assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale. As the score increases, spasticity increases. The minimum score for this scale is 1 and the maximum score is 5.
Time frame: Baseline
Stage of hemiplegia
"Brunnstrom Hemiplegia Recovery Staging" will be used to determine the hemiplegic stage of the patients. This scale is scored between 1 and 6. As the score increases, the patient improves.
Time frame: Baseline
Motor function
The "Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale" will be used to evaluate upper extremity motor functions. This scale ranges from 0 to 66 points. As the score increases, motor function improves.
Time frame: Baseline, five week later (after intervention), 3 months later
Dominant side
The "Edinburgh Hand Preference Test" will be used to determine the dominant side used by the patient in daily life.
Time frame: Baseline
Trunk Impairment
"Trunk Impairment Scale" will be used to evaluate trunk impairment in stroke patients. The maximum score that can be obtained from the scale is 23 points. A low score indicates poor performance, a high score indicates good performance
Time frame: Baseline
Upper extremity function
Evaluation of upper extremity functions (hand-arm) and motor speed will be done with the "Nine-Hole Peg Test". Function decreases as the time spent for the test increases.
Time frame: Baseline, five week later (after intervention), 3 months later
Functional Independence
Evaluation of upper extremity functions will be done with the "Nine-Hole Peg Test". Function decreases as the time spent on the test increases.
Time frame: Baseline, five week later (after intervention), 3 months later
Cognitif Function
Mini Mental Test will be used to evaluate cognitive functions. In the evaluation, 24-30 points indicate that cognitive functions are normal, 18-23 points indicate mild cognitive impairment, and 17 points and below indicate that cognitive status is severely affected.
Time frame: Baseline
Neglect
The Catherine Bergego Scale will be used to assess the impact of unilateral neglect after stroke on activities of daily living. 1-10 indicates mild neglect, 11-20 indicates moderate neglect, and 21-30 indicates severe neglect.
Time frame: Baseline
Life Quality
The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale will be used to assess the quality of life of individuals with stroke. The higher the total score, the better the quality of life of the individual with stroke. This scale is scored between 49-245.As the score increases, the quality of life increases.
Time frame: Baseline, five week later (after intervention), 3 months later
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.