Our research is planned as a randomised clinical trial. The main aim of our study is to evaluate the clinical success of band and loop space maintainers produced by three-dimensional printer and conventional technique and the changes they cause in periodontal tissues.
Participants will be selected by simple random selection from systemically healthy children who will need bilateral lower deciduous first molar extraction and space maintainer application from patients who apply to Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics for treatment. The study will be carried out in a split-mouth design, and it is planned to place a band and loop space maintainer produced by conventional technique on one side and a band and loop space maintainer produced with a three-dimensional printer on the other side in the lower jaw. The clinical success of these two appliances and the changes in periodontal tissues will be compared. In order to evaluate the clinical success, the survival of the appliances and the determined failure criteria (Dissolution of the bonding cement, Separation/breakage from solder area, Embedding of the space maintainer inside towards the gum, Loop distortion/breakage, Inflammation of the gingiva adjacent to/around the space maintainer, Plaque accumulation around the band) will be taken into consideration. In order to evaluate the effects on periodontal tissues, pocket depth, plaque index values, gingival index values will be recorded and PLAP-1 and TNF-a levels in the gingival groove fluid will be examined for more detailed periodontal examination. The total planned follow-up period is 18 months, with patients invited for follow-up appointments at six-month intervals. Evaluations will be made at the end of the study with repeated measurements at baseline and control sessions.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
27
Band and loop space maintainer produced with three-dimensional printer using micro laser sinterisation method
Band and loop space maintainer produced with conventional methods
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Aydin, Aydın, Turkey (Türkiye)
RECRUITINGClinical success
The clinical success rate of appliances in terms of survival time by checking both space maintainers for these failure criteria: Dissolution of the bonding cement, loop distortion/breakage, separation/breakage from solder area ( for soldered conventional band and loop space maintainer).
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Evaluation of periodontal tissue changes around both space maintainers according to the periodontal pocket depth measuring
The pocket depth will be measured by probing the six sides of the teeth (mesio-buccal, mesio-lingual, disto-buccal, disto-lingual, mid-buccal, mid-lingual).
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Evaluation of periodontal tissue changes around both space maintainers according to Plaque index values
Plaque index, that is running in a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 means no plaque,1 film of plaque adhering to free gingival margin,2 moderate accumulation of soft deposits on the tooth and gingival margin, and 3 means abundance of soft debris.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Evaluation of periodontal tissue changes around both space maintainers according to the gingival index values
In order to evaluate the effects of both space maintainers on periodontal tissues, gingival index values will be recorded at baseline, 6th, 12th and 18th months. Gingival index, scores from 0 to 3 where 0 no inflammation, 1slight redness no bleeding on probing, 2 redness and bleeding on probing, and 3 severe inflammation with edema and ulceration to spontaneous bleeding.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Evaluation of periodontal tissue changes around both space maintainers with gingival groove fluid examination
For detailed periodontal evaluation, PLAP-1 and TNF-a levels in the gingival groove fluid will be examined at the baseline and 6th month visits. Gingival groove fluid samples will be taken from two separate points of the teeth which the bands of the band and loop space maintainers' had been placed, with PerioPaper strips. Afterwards, the strips taken from each tooth will be packaged separately in eppendorf tubes and stored at -80 degrees until it is time to evaluate. The samples will be evaluated by ELISA tests then the results will be compared.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline and 6.month
Measuring space maintaining efficiency
With the help of a digital caliper, the contact points of the teeth adjacent to the extraction space will be measured and the effective protection of the space will be monitored. First measurement will be done right before the space maintainers' placement. The caliper measurement will be repeated at the 6th, 12th and 18th months.
Time frame: Up to18 months
Comparing the two impression methods in terms of patient satisfaction.
Two different impression methods will be used for the two techniques in the impression phase required for the production of the space maintainers. For the appliance to be produced with a three-dimensional printer, digital impressions will be taken with 3Shape intraoral scanner. For the conventional space maintainer production, impressions will be taken with traditional impression spoons using alginate material. With the help of a Likert scale from 1 to 5(with the help of smiley faces), the satisfaction levels of the children about the impression phases will be measured right after the impression process finished.
Time frame: Immediately after the impression procedure