The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant capecitabine and cyclophosphamide treatment in patients affected by huge Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) (peritoneal cancer index \>28). Treatment consists of metronomic (low-dose medication for a prolonged time) of capecitabine plus cyclophosphamide for 6 months followed by standard of care cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The main question the trial aims to answer is which is the proportion of patients with complete cytoreduction at CRS/HIPEC after neoadjuvant metronomic approach with oral capecitabine and cyclophosphamide in patients affected by huge PMP.
Mucinous neoplasms are the most common appendiceal tumors, and the most common cause of Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). The term PMP defines a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive accumulation of mucinous material within the abdominal-pelvic cavity, ultimately leading to patient death due to local-regional progression of the disease. The upfront cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is regarded as standard treatment for PMP. However, not every PMP patient benefit from upfront CRS and HIPEC. A proportion of patients could be inoperable due to a lack of clinical conditions for clinical deterioration or comorbidites contra-indicating surgery, or an unresectable disease at the diagnosis. Up to 32% of cases could be present the so-called huge PMP (peritoneal cancer index \>28), where the proportion of patients with complete cytoreduction is low of their entire cohort of PMP patients. Moreover, CRS in huge PMPs generally requires very extensive surgical maneuvers such as total gastric or total colon resection. Hence, the patients suffer from a significant impact on postoperative quality of life due to nutritional issues. Preoperative systemic chemotherapy might be an option for such advanced cases, as it can possibly reduce the tumor burden, allowing less extensive surgery with less visceral resections. Systemic treatment regimens are associated with relevant toxicity and highcosts. Metronomic schedules might be preferred because of their favorable safety profileand antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties. In unresectable or progressive PMP, a single-center prospective uncontrolled trial showed the safety and promising activity results of a continuous metronomic regimen with capecitabine with cyclophosphamide. At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, median progression-free survival was 9.5 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 73.7%. Overall, the disease control rate was 87%, and 6 (27%) patients achieved disease control ≥12 months. On this basis, a phase II, mono-institutional, single arm trial was designed, evaluating neoadjuvant metronomic capecitabine and cyclophosphamide in patients affected by huge Pseudomyxoma peritonei who are potentially candidates to cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant metronomic approach with oral capecitabine and cyclophosphamide in patients affected by huge PMP. In details, after the identification of patients affected by PMP, the measurement of peritoneal cancer index will be assessed by chest and abdominal CT scan at the staging phase. Only patients with PCI\>28 will be recruited regardless of resectability. Once enrolled, the patients will receive staging laparoscopy in order to confirm the histological diagnosis, to accurately stage the disease with the surgical PCI, to be compared with the radiological PCI for accuracy evaluation, and to collect material for the translational analyses. Then the patients will receive a continuous treatment schedule of oral metronomic chemotherapy with capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/day (625 mg/m2 BID) continuously with cyclophosphamide 50 mg/day continuously, for a total of 6 four-weekly cycles. At the completion of the cycles, the patients will be restaged and, as long as they are considered operable, they will be submitted to standard of care cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC, in order to define the reaching of the primary endpoint of completeness of cytoreduction. A total number of 31 patients are planned to be included in the study according to the statistical design.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
31
Capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 /day) and Cyclophosphamide (50 mg/day) continuous daily dosing. Cycles are to be repeated every 28 days for a total of 6 cycles.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, Italy
RECRUITINGThe proportion of patients with complete cytoreduction after neoadjuvant metronomic approach with oral capecitabine and cyclophosphamide in patients affected by huge PMP.
Use of Completeness of Cytoreduction score to evaluate the radicality of Cytoreductive Surgery. Patients with a residual disease \<2.5 mm will be considered completely cytoreduced, otherwise incompletely cytoreduced. "Completeness of Cytoreduction Score" ranging from the best cc-0: no peritoneal nodule was seen, afterwards cc-1,tumor nodules persisting after cytoreduction are less than 2.5 mm in diameter, then cc-2, tumor nodules persisting after cytoreduction are between 2.5 mm and 2.5 cm in diameter to the worst cc-3, tumor nodules persisting after cytoreduction are greater than 2.5 cm
Time frame: 6-8 months from the start of treatment
Radiological objective tumor response rate.
Objective tumor response rate will be defined by two independent radiologists by means of CT (computed tomography) scans. Tumour response will be determined semiquantitatively as either stable, reduced or progressed.
Time frame: Performed at baseline and 16 weeks from the start of treatment.
Conversion rate
Conversion rate will be calculated dividing the number of resectable cases after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy by the number of resectable cases before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Resectability will be evaluated with CT scans using Bouquot et al. methodology.
Time frame: 6-8 months from the start of treatment
Downsizing of the tumor measured by surgical Peritoneal Cancer index (PCI).
Downsizing of the tumor will be measured at the time of staging laparoscopy and CRS using Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI). Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ranging from the best 0 to the worst 39.
Time frame: Performed after 16 weeks.
Safety and tolerability of neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event will be measured using NCI-CTCAE v5.
Time frame: 6-8 months.
Major complications (NCI-CTCAE v5) associated with CRS and HIPEC
Major complications associated with CRS and HIPEC will be measured using NCI-CTCAE v5.
Time frame: 30 days after surgery.
Quality of life EQ-5D-5L
Quality of life will be assessed through Patient reported outcomes (PRO) instrument. EuroQol EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L uses for first 5 questions qualitative multiple choice answers with NO SCALE. For the last questions, a score from 0 to 100 indicates from the worst to the best outcome.
Time frame: Before/after neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy, and 30 days after the surgery.
Progression-free survival
Progression-free Survival (PFS) is the time between the date of chemotherapy commencement and the date of Disease-Progression or Death, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: After 24 months.
Overall Survival.
Overall Survival (OS) is the time between the date of chemotherapy commencement and date of Death or last follow up.
Time frame: After 48 months.
Quality of life EORTC-QLQ-C30
Quality of life will be assessed through Patient reported outcomes (PRO) instrument. EORTC QLQ-C30 For questions 1-28 of EORTC QLQ-C30 a 4-point scale is used. It scores from 1 to 4: 1 ("Not at all"), 2 ("A little"), 3 ("Quite a bit")and 4 ("Very much"). Half points are not allowed. The range is 3. For the raw score, less points are considered to have a better outcome. For the questions 29 and 30 of EORTC QLQ-C30 a 7-points scale is used. It scores from 1 to 7: 1 ("very poor") to 7 ("excellent"). Half points are not allowed. The range is 6. First of all, raw score has to be calculated with mean values. Afterwards linear transformation is performed to be comparable. More points are considered to have a better outcome.
Time frame: Within 30 days after the date of surgery.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.