The recent introduction of the new generation of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) will change the future of obesity treatment. These highly effective medications, such as high-dose semaglutide and tirzepatide, are hormone analogues that augment the incretin function and exert multiple physiological effects by activating glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and/or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) distributed in various organs. These medications provide an average of 15-22% weight reduction in one-year trials, which had not been seen in the past with medical therapy. While the literature suggests that bariatric surgery is superior to these new highly effective medications, there is no head-to-head comparison between the most common bariatric operations (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass \[RYGB\] and sleeve gastrectomy \[SG\]) with semaglutide (once weekly) and tirzepatide (once weekly). The goal of this Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is to compare these effective therapies in patients with severe obesity to provide the best evidence to inform clinical decisions in treating patients with obesity.
This is a randomized, non-blinded, controlled efficacy/safety study with 3 parallel groups who will either receive bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG), semaglutide, or tirzepatide. The study has 2 phases: the first 12 months for the assessment of the primary endpoint ( mean percentage weight loss) and the second 12 months as the extension phase of the study to mimic the real-life setting. Findings at the end of each phase will be separately reported. A randomized trial of 125 patients with a BMI of 35-65 kg/m2 who sought treatment for obesity at Cleveland Clinic will be performed. Patients who meet the ASMBS/IFSO 2022 guidelines for bariatric surgery will be invited for possible enrollment. Interested and eligible patients will be randomized to receive their already chosen bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG), tirzepatide. or semaglutide in 2:2:1 ratio. The study is not intended to compare RYGB vs SG head-to-head. RYGB and SG constitute one group as a bariatric surgery group. The assignment of RYGB or SG is not based on a randomized design. Each patient and surgical team will make a shared decision about the most appropriate surgical procedure. The study is also not intended to compare semaglutide vs tirzepatide head-to-head. In the second or extension phase of the study, participants are followed from month 12 to month 24, regardless of the treatment that they receive. In this phase, the study medications (semaglutide and tirzepatide) will not be provided by the study. The goal of this phase is to provide valuable insights into A) access to AOMs and the durability of effects in the real-life setting, B) cross-over from AOMs to bariatric surgery, and C) adjuvant pharmacotherapy after bariatric surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
125
Patients receive either RYGB or SG. The surgical risk, the differential impact of each procedure on body weight and other obesity-related diseases, presence of other medical and mental problems, patient's behavioral factors (e.g., postoperative compliance, active smoking), medications, and goals will be considered when the patient and local medical team make a shared decision about the most appropriate surgical procedure.
Semaglutide will be initiated at a dose of 0.25 mg once weekly and will be increased during the dose-escalation period to reach a maintenance dose of up to 2.4 mg once weekly by week 16. If patients do not tolerate a dose during dose escalation, we will consider delaying dose escalation until next visit (for 4 weeks). Dosing for Semaglutide is the FDA-approved dosing schedule. The maintenance dose is 2.4 mg injected subcutaneously once-weekly. The protocol allows for dose reductions in case a participant does not tolerate the recommended target dose of 2.4 mg and may stay at the lower maintenance dose level (e.g., 1.7 mg once weekly), if needed.
Tirzepatide will be initiated at a dose of 2.5 mg once weekly and will be increased by 2.5 mg every week during the dose-escalation period to reach a maintenance dose of up to 15 mg once weekly by week 20. If patients do not tolerate a dose during dose escalation, we will consider delaying dose escalation until next visit (for 4 weeks). Dosing for Tirzepatide is the FDA-approved dosing schedule. The maintenance dose is 15 mg injected subcutaneously once-weekly. The protocol allows for dose reductions in case a participant does not tolerate the recommended target dose of 15 mg and may stay at the lower maintenance dose level (e.g., 10 mg once weekly), if needed.
The Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
RECRUITINGThe mean percentage weight loss
The mean percentage weight loss at 52 weeks for the following 2 comparisons: * Bariatric surgery (RYGB and SG) vs tirzepatide * Bariatric surgery (RYGB and SG) vs semaglutide
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Percentage of Participants Achieving Weight Loss Milestones (Body weight related end points)
Percentage of participants achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, ≥20%, ≥25%, ≥30%, and ≥35% weight loss from baseline
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Absolute Change in Weight (Body weight related end points)
Mean absolute change in weight measured in kilograms from baseline to 52 weeks
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Absolute Change in BMI (Body weight related end points)
Absolute change in BMI measured in kg/m\^2 from baseline to 52 weeks
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Excess Weight Loss Percentage (Body weight related end points)
Percentage of excess weight loss, calculated by dividing the difference between initial BMI and final BMI by the difference between initial BMI and a target BMI of 25
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Change in Waist Circumference (Body weight related end points)
Change in waist circumferential measurement above the level of the iliac crests measured in centimeters from baseline to 52 weeks
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Systolic blood pressure trends
Mean and change in systolic blood pressure measured in mmHg
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Mean and change from baseline in lipid panel
Mean and change from baseline in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides measured in mg/dL
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers in T2DM patients
Mean and change from baseline in blood glucose (measured in mg/dL) and HbA1c (as a percentage) in patients with T2DM
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Percentage of patients with T2DM meeting predefined HbA1c targets
Percentage of patients meeting different HbA1c targets, for example: * HbA1c \<6.5% (without diabetes medications) * HbA1c \<7% (irrespective of taking diabetes medications or not)
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Changes in inflammatory marker, CRP
Mean and change from baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) measured in mg/L
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Changes in Lipoprotein(a)
Mean and change from baseline in Lipoprotein(a) measured in mg/dL
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Change in cardiovascular and diabetes medications
Change in the number of cardiovascular and diabetes medications prescribed
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Change from baseline in quality of life metrics
Change from baseline in score of The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (physical and mental components). Each item is given a score ranging from 0-100. Lower scores indicating poor outcomes. Final score is an average of all the items that were answered. Unanswered questions are not included in the final average. Research coordinator completes the survey with the patient.
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Change in body composition (via Seca mBCA 554 Bioimpedance Analysis)
Change in body composition (% fat mass and % fat-free mass) as measured by Seca mBCA 554 Bioimpedance Analysis to assess whether that weight loss is primarily caused by reduction in fat mass or not.
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Mean change in liver fat content (via MRI-PDFF)
Mean change from baseline in liver fat content as assessed by MRI-PDFF measured as a percentage
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥5%, ≥30%, ≥50% Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat Content (via MRI-PDFF)
Percentage of participants achieving at least 5%, 30%, or 50% relative reduction in liver fat content from baseline
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
Percentage of Participants Achieving MRI-PDFF Normalization (via MRI-PDFF)
Percentage of participants achieving MRI-PDFF normalization, defined as a liver fat content of \<5%, at week 52
Time frame: First 52 weeks of the study
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.