Wound Healing and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Gingival Graft Harvesting from the Palate

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether two different techniques for treating palatal wounds-sutures and cyanoacrylate bioadhesive-can influence postoperative morbidity, clinical healing, and soft tissue dimensional changes in patients undergoing epithelialized gingival graft harvesting from the palate. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the use of cyanoacrylate bioadhesive reduce postoperative morbidity compared to sutures? Does the choice of wound treatment technique affect clinical healing and three-dimensional changes in soft tissues? Researchers will compare the sutures (control group) to the cyanoacrylate bioadhesive (test group) to determine if the bioadhesive leads to improved postoperative outcomes. Participants will: Undergo epithelialized gingival graft harvesting from the palate. Receive either sutures or cyanoacrylate bioadhesive for wound closure. Be monitored for postoperative morbidity, clinical healing, and soft tissue dimensional changes.

Objectives Overall objective The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical, volumetric, and patient-centered outcomes of autogenous gingival graft harvesting when treating the palate with different protective agents. Specific objectives * To assess wound healing, volumetric changes, post-operative pain and bleeding, eating discomfort, and analgesic consumption after EGG harvesting and protecting the palate with the following agents: (1) suturing; (2) cyanoacrylate bioadhesive. * To assess any correlations between palate wound healing dynamics and patient-reported outcomes. * To determine which demographic, anatomical, and surgical factors are correlated with higher post-operative pain and discomfort. Hypothesis Null hypotheses * H01: Using different palate protection agents provides similar wound healing and patient-reported outcomes. * H02: There are no correlations between palate wound healing dynamics and patient-reported outcomes. * H03: There are no correlations between demographic, anatomical, and surgical factors with higher post-operative pain and discomfort. Alternative hypotheses * H11: The use of different palate protection agents provides different wound healing and patient-reported outcomes. * H12: There is a correlation between palate wound healing dynamics and patient-reported outcomes. * H13: There are correlations between demographic, anatomical, and surgical factors with higher post-operative pain and discomfort. Materials and methods * Study design This study will be designed as a randomized controlled clinical study with parallel arms and a 2-month postoperative follow-up period. * Setting of the study The study will be performed at the university clinic (CUO) of Universitat Internacional de Catalunya of Barcelona, Spain (UIC). Subjects will be selected, on a consecutive basis, among individuals referred to the Department of Periodontology at UIC. The study protocol and informed consent was reviewed by the Ethical Committee of the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, and will be conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration, 1975, as revised in 2013. * Study population Patients requiring mucogingival surgery for root coverage or soft tissue augmentation will be recruited. * Pre-surgical treatment For periodontal patients, steps 1 and 2 of periodontal therapy will be completed before surgery. All patients will receive pre-surgical prophylaxis and oral hygiene instructions. * Surgical treatment and study groups The surgeries will be performed by the postgraduate students of the Master's Degree in Periodontology at UIC Barcelona, Spain. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups using a computer-generated randomization table. Each patient's assigned group will be communicated to the operator through a sealed envelope that will be opened during the surgery, immediately after the graft harvesting procedure is completed. On the day of the surgery, local anesthesia will be administered (4% Articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000), and an EGG will be harvested with a 15C blade. The dimensions of the graft will be decided by the surgeon, according to treatment needs. For bilaminar techniques, the harvested graft will be extra-orally de-epithelialized (DGG), while the epithelium will be maintained in cases utilizing free gingival graft techniques. After covering the palatal wound with sterile gauze for a few seconds, the wound will be treated according to the patient's randomized assigned procedure: (1) suturing; (2) cyanoacrylate bioadhesive. 1. Suturing (Control Group) In this group, 5-0 non-resorbable suspensory mattress sutures will be anchored to the soft tissues apical to the palatal wound area (5-0 Polypropylene, Prolene, Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA). 2. Cyanoacrylate bioadhesive (Test Group) In this group, several drops of a high-viscosity cyanoacrylate bioadhesive will be applied (Cuantum Oral Adhesive, Cuantum Medical Cosmetics S.L., Spain) to create a uniform adhesive layer. No sutures will be placed. * Post-surgical instructions and infection control Patients will be instructed to avoid mechanical trauma or brushing in the surgical sites for 2 weeks. Analgesics (ibuprofen 600 mg t.i.d for 5 days) will be prescribed and patients will be instructed to rinse with Chlorhexidine 0.12% b.i.d. for two weeks when sutures are removed. After suture removal, patients will resume mechanical toothbrushing with a soft toothbrush. * Blindness The two clinical examiners will not be aware of the treatment allocation. However, because of the study design (suture vs. no suture), during the first weeks maintaining blindness will be impossible. The researcher who will perform the digital measurements will be blinded. Blindness will be maintained strictly confidential by the investigators. * Data collection A guidebook will be prepared to systematize the procedures for sample and data collection. The data will be later transferred to a computerized database (Epidata®, Odense, Denmark, Europe). * Sociodemographic data An interview will be conducted during the pre-surgical visit to obtain information regarding age, gender, medical history, current medications, smoking habits, and previous periodontal surgeries. * A questionnaire will be prepared and handed to patients on the day of the surgery. Patients will be instructed to answer the questions at the same time of the day and refer only to the palatal wound. Post-operative pain, post-operative bleeding, discomfort at eating, and analgesic consumption will be assessed. At the final follow-up visit (8 weeks), patients will be handed an Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP5) to assess the influence of the intervention on their quality of life. * Clinical outcomes such as the graft dimensions and the Palatal Wound Healing Score will be evaluated.The palatal wound healing score will be assessed by two blinded clinical examiners independently. The inter-rater reliability will be calculated to validate the score. * A digital dental scan of the whole arch will be taken with an intraoral scanner (3Shape Trios, Copenhagen, Denmark) using a bilateral mouth retractor to obtain standard tessellation language (STL) files. The acquired data will be transferred into digital imaging software (3Shape Trios®, Erlangen, Germany) in which the patient name will be substituted by a random ID number to anonymize the data. The STL model at baseline (T0) will be considered as a reference, and consecutively, the digital surface models after immediate EGG harvesting (T1), at 1-week postsurgery (T2), 2 weeks (T3), 3 weeks (T4), 4 weeks (T5), and 8 weeks (T6), will be imported and aligned using the "initial alignment" and "best-fit alignment" tools (Geomagic, 3D Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) using the tool Control X. To guarantee maximum accuracy, the palatal surfaces of the concerned teeth will be used as reference landmarks for the alignment of the different time points. The Region of Interest (ROI) will be determined as a rectangular shape corresponding to the palatal wound immediately after epithelial gingival graft harvesting. The digital measurements will be performed by a single, calibrated examiner. The intra-operator reliability will be measured on 10 random patients before the measurements of the study cases. The following measurements will be performed: the Wound Area, the mean distance between baseline and follow-up surfaces at the level of the Region Of Interest; linear Dimensional changes. * A Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) will be performed before the surgery and the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) and STL of the immediate post-op will be superimposed using an implant planning program (Bluesky Bio). The following measurements will be taken: initial palatal thickness; remaining palatal thickness, measured in the center of the graft at the 3 levels mentioned above. * Sample size calculation Based on a previous study, the sample size was calculated using post-operative pain as the primary outcome. Assuming a similar Standard Deviation (2.4) and effect size (f) of 0.81, a minimum of 50 patients is needed to detect a significant difference in pain levels with 80% power. To account for an estimated dropout rate of 20%, the sample size was adjusted to 66 patients. This will ensure adequate power to detect large effect sizes for graft area and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. Therefore, 33 patients are deemed necessary in each group to achieve the significance level of 0.05. * Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics will be performed for continuous and categorical variables using means and standard deviations or frequencies and percentages. The Kruskal-Wallis (continuous variables) or chi-square (categorical variables) tests will analyze characteristics across the treatment groups. Multiple random effects regression models will be applied to evaluate VAS changes across the three groups over time. Adjustments will be performed for gender, age, and clinical characteristics (graft height, width, and thickness). Group-time interaction will be tested using a global Wald test. Differences between baseline and post-operative follow-ups will be analyzed using the Wilcoxon test (quantitative variables) or paired t-student according to the distribution of the data and McNemar's test (qualitative variables). The association between Wound Healing Score and Wound Area from one hand and post-operative pain, post-operative bleeding, discomfort at eating, and analgesic consumption from the other hand, will be evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test or the t-student, depending on the distribution of the data. To disclose associations between them, the Pearson or Spearman correlations will be employed. The level of statistical significance will be set at p \< 0.05. Statistical analyses will be performed.