We aimed to evaluate the usability and efficacy of omalizumab in allergic rhinitis and its potential as an alternative treatment option.
The study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of omalizumab on symptoms in patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis and to compare it with current medical treatment options.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
The patients in the study group were started on omalizumab and intranasal fluticasone propionate. Omalizumab was administered subcutaneously to these patients at a dose of 300 mg once a month. . Twenty-five patients in the control group were started on intranasal fluticasone propionate spray and a tablet containing 5 mg desloratadine+10 mg montelukast sodium at the same dose and in the same manner as the patients in the study group. The patients were asked to use 100 mg of suspension equivalent to 50 micrograms of fluticasone propionate as two sprays into each nostril once daily and to use the tablet once daily. Patients in both groups were asked to fill out the visual analog scale and their total Ig E levels were checked. Patients who were called for a check-up after eight to ten weeks were evaluated again with the visual analog scale.
Yuzuncu Yıl üniversity dursun odabaş medical center
Van, tuşba, Turkey (Türkiye)
omalizumab treatment process
Vas scores including runny nose, nasal congestion, sneezing, tearing and itching in the eyes were compared before and 3 months after omalizumab treatment.
Time frame: Patients were followed up for 3 months after starting treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.