Observational retrospective cohort study to assess clinical outcomes in patients with primary versus secondary antiphospholipid syndrome
Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is an autoimmune disorder associated with positive antiphospholipid antibodies including the lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies IgG or IgM, and/or anti-ß2-glycoprotein IgG or IgM associated with thrombotic problems and pregnancy loss. Antiphospholipid syndrome is one of the most frequent forms of acquired thrombophilia and is associated with an increased risk of both venous and arterial thrombotic events. Thirty to 40% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have associated antiphospholipid syndrome. Antiphospholipid syndrome has estimated incidence in the general population of 2.1 (1.4-2.8) per 100 000, and the prevalence of 50 (42-58) per 100 000. APS is more common in female with a female to male ratio is 3.5:1 for primary and 7:1 for secondary. Antiphospholipid syndrome is divided into two types primary syndrome without an underlying disease, and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome that is associated with another autoimmune syndrome, most commonly Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Patients with APS are more at risk of recurrent thrombosis (3). n a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with APS, venous thromboembolism (VTE) was found to be the commonest manifestation (47.5%) followed by arterial thromboembolism (43.1%) then materno fetal problems which were found only in 9.7% of patients, and finally, catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) represented in only 2.5 percent of the cases (4). The clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome include haematological (thrombocytopenia, venous thrombosis), obstetrical (recurrent pregnancy loss), neurological (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, seizures), cardiovascular, dermatological such as livedo reticularis, skin ulceration and necrosis, renal (glomerulonephritis and renal thrombotic microangiopathy), and orthopedic (avascular necrosis of bones). the manifestation spectrum ranged from asymptomatic antiphospholipid antibodies positivity, various non-criteria manifestations, obstetric morbidity, thrombosis, to life-threatening catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. The wide manifestation spectrum led to a heterogeneous entity and brought challenges to management of the syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare primary versus secondary effects of antiphospholipid syndrome on the development of thrombosis and its outcomes.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
52
Maha Abdel-Aziz
Asyut, Egypt
to compare percentage of patients with primary versus secondary antiphospholipid syndrome in developing recurrent thrombosis
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.