A prospective, multi-center randomized trial comparing the Revivent System plus GDMT to GDMT alone. A total of approximately 135 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 allocation ratio (90 treatment and 45 control), with approximately 128 evaluable patients and assuming 5% loss to follow-up. A primary safety endpoint will be evaluated at 30 days. Primary efficacy endpoint will be at 1 year. Interim efficacy endpoints will be evaluated at 6 months.
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the BioVentrix Revivent System plus GDMT compared to GDMT alone for the treatment of LV anterior/apical scar/aneurysm with possible additional involvement of the lateral, septal, and/or inferior regions in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Safety will be assessed compared with a Performance Goal based on surgical ventriculoplasty outcomes (MAE's at 30 days).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
135
BioVentrix has developed the Revivent System to mirror Surgical Ventricular Restoration (SVR). The Revivent System is used to place permanent cardiac implants to the epicardial surface for the purpose of reconfiguring abnormal cardiac geometry that is contributing to the dysfunction.
Banner University Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
RECRUITINGBaptist Health South Florida
Miami, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGSaint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
RECRUITINGOklahoma Heart Hospital
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
RECRUITINGPenn State Health
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGMajor Adverse Events Composite Performance Goal
Composite of Major Adverse Events at 30 days comprised of Clinical Events Committee (CEC) Adjudication of Mortality, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Major Stroke, Prolonged Intubation \>48hrs, Need for Inotropic support \>24hrs, Mech circulatory support intra or post op, BARC 4 or 5 bleeding, reoperation, serious infection related to device or procedure, Cardiac tamponade, or Initiation of renal replacement therapy, with a Performance Goal (PG) of 70% (upper bound of the 97.5% one sided CI)
Time frame: 30 days
Composite Effectiveness Endpoint
Using Finkelstein Schoenfeld (FS) hierarchical approach. This approach compares each treatment subject versus each control subject in a hierarchal fashion beginning with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (+10 point improvement with higher score being better), 6 Minute Walk Test (+25meter improvement with longer distance being better), change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class (+1 point improvement with scale being 1 to 4 with lower value being better). Begin comparing at highest hierarchal assessment. If one group is "better than" the other, count as "win". If treatment and control subject equal at that assessment, compare to next hierarchal measure, if equal again, go to next until you have a "win". Compare overall wins versus loses for an overall win ratio.
Time frame: 6 Months
Composite Effectiveness Endpoint
Using Finkelstein Schoenfeld (FS) hierarchical approach - Cardiovascular Mortality, Heart Transplant, Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Implantation, Hospital Readmission, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (+10 point improvement with higher score being better), 6 Minute Walk Test (+25meter improvement with longer distance being better), change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class (+1 point improvement with scale being 1 to 4 with lower value being better). Begin comparing at highest hierarchal assessment. If one group is "better than" the other, count as "win". If treatment and control subject equal at that assessment, compare to next hierarchal measure, if equal again, go to next until you have a "win". Compare overall wins versus loses for an overall win ratio.
Time frame: 12 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.