Prevention of Postoperative Hernias in Emergency Surgery

Overview

The aim of this observational study is to understand the risk factors and incidence of postoperative hernias among patients undergoing emergency surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: What is the incidence of postoperative hernias in this group of patients? A brief telephone interview will be conducted with participants who will be included in this study one year after the surgery. If the presence of a postoperative hernia is suspected, the patient will be invited to a follow-up visit to the surgical clinic, where the diagnosis will be confirmed by imaging tests.

Introduction Emergency and urgent surgical procedures carry a high risk of complications. One of the long-term complications is postoperative hernia. Despite numerous studies analysing methods to reduce the incidence of this complication, it remains a significant surgical problem. Studies covering both elective and emergency procedures report that postoperative hernias occur in 2% to 40% of operated patients. The discrepancies in reported incidence rates may result from the asymptomatic nature of some hernias. An example is port-site hernias, for which the exact incidence is not fully determined. Another significant surgical issue is parastomal hernias, occurring in up to 50% of patients. Differences in the incidence of postoperative hernias also arise from the method and duration of patient follow-up. Due to these factors and the specificity of emergency procedures, the frequency of postoperative hernias is often underestimated in this patient group. Considering the clinical consequences of postoperative hernias, preventing their occurrence is crucial. According to the literature, patients with diabetes, chronic lung disease, smoking habits, obesity, immunodeficiency, or a history of previous abdominal surgeries are at high risk of developing postoperative hernias. The European Hernia Society guidelines highlight the need for further research on methods for preventing postoperative hernias. The surgical approach and technique also influence the incidence of this complication. One of the technical factors is the method of fascial closure. According to the World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines, the "small bites" technique is suggested for closing midline laparotomies to prevent postoperative hernias and wound complications in emergency surgery; however, the evidence comes from elective procedures. These guidelines emphasise the necessity of conducting prospective studies to confirm the efficacy of this technique in emergency and urgent surgeries. Other aspects of surgical technique, such as suture material, routine use of subcutaneous or intra-abdominal drains, and their impact on postoperative hernia incidence, remain a topic of debate. The number of large, multicentre studies analysing prevention strategies for this complication is limited, especially concerning postoperative management. According to the available literature, including the European Hernia Society guidelines, the use of abdominal binders and the timing of full activity resumption remain controversial and require further investigation. Another known risk factor for postoperative hernias is surgical site infection, which affects approximately one-third of patients undergoing emergency procedures. A less common but significant surgical complication influencing postoperative hernia development is wound dehiscence, with an estimated incidence of around 4%. Both surgical site infections and wound dehiscence are associated with increased perioperative mortality, making the optimisation of therapeutic strategies to reduce their occurrence essential. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of postoperative hernias among patients undergoing emergency surgery and to identify modifiable risk factors for their occurrence. Understanding these factors will help reduce the incidence of this complication and improve treatment outcomes by developing effective preventive strategies for this specific patient group. Methodology This study will be a nationwide, prospective, cohort, multicentre observational study conducted from 1 June 2025 to 31 December 2026. It will be coordinated by the Department of Surgical Medicine with the Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce. The study has been approved by the Bioethics Committee of Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce (approval number: 5/2025). The study plan is as follows: 1. Recruitment of study centres - April/May 2025. 2. Patient recruitment - 1 June 2025 - 31 December 2025. 3. Follow-up period - 1 January 2026 - 31 December 2026. 4. Data analysis - January 2027. 5. Publication of study results - February/March 2027. Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: * Patient age \> 18 years. * Emergency or urgent surgery. * Specific surgical indications (acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, incarcerated hernia, gastrointestinal perforation, and obstruction). Exclusion criteria: * Lack of patient consent. * Open abdomen technique applied. The study will analyse data from medical history (comorbidities, previous surgical history) and selected preoperative laboratory tests. The method of fascial closure, use of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous drains, and postoperative management will also be assessed. Additionally, preventive measures for surgical site infections, such as wound irrigation, delayed wound closure, and negative pressure dressings, will be evaluated. The study will also examine preventive measures for postoperative hernias, including abdominal binders/tapes and the timing of full physical activity resumption. Primary outcomes: * Incidence of incisional hernia. * Incidence of port-site hernia after laparoscopy. * Incidence of parastomal hernia after open/laparoscopic stoma formation. Secondary outcomes: * Incidence of surgical site infection. * Incidence of wound dehiscence. Follow-up will be conducted via a brief telephone medical interview 12 months after hospital discharge to assess the incidence of postoperative hernias. If a postoperative hernia is suspected, the patient will undergo an outpatient examination, and the presence of a hernia will be confirmed via ultrasound or CT scan. After the follow-up period, each participating centre will submit an anonymised database to the study coordinator, where individual datasets will be consolidated for statistical analysis. Statistical Analysis The study will analyse the following data: * Demographic: age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, ASA score, surgical indication. * Operative: open vs. minimally invasive technique, type of surgery, fascial closure method, wound irrigation, use of subcutaneous drains, and prophylactic negative pressure dressings. * Postoperative: prevention strategies for postoperative hernias, time to full physical activity resumption. The incidence of primary outcomes will be assessed with a 95% confidence interval. The frequency of secondary outcomes (surgical site infection and wound dehiscence) will also be evaluated with a 95% confidence interval. Continuous variables will be presented as median with interquartile range, while categorical variables will be reported as case numbers and percentages. Student's t-test or Wilcoxon test will be used for comparing continuous variables, while the Chi-square test will be applied to categorical data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models will be developed to assess hernia risk factors. Relative risk for potential risk factors will also be calculated. A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis will be performed using R software in the RStudio environment. To estimate the study sample size, a power analysis was conducted. A minimum of 255 cases is required to estimate the postoperative hernia incidence with 5% accuracy and a 95% confidence interval. For port-site hernias, at least 188 cases are needed, while for parastomal hernias, 349 cases are required. The required sample size for surgical site infections is 255 cases, and for wound dehiscence, 93 cases. The total study population will consist approximately 500 patients, which includes an estimated 10% dropout rate. Authorship Criteria Investigators enrolling at least 40 patients will qualify for "named authorship" (two researchers per centre). Those enrolling 20-40 patients will qualify for "named authorship" (one researcher per centre). Researchers enrolling fewer than 20 patients will be listed under "collaborative authorship". This study will contribute to the understanding of perioperative management in emergency surgery patients and improve treatment outcomes in this group.