The purpose of this study is to see if having the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) procedure done in a hospital with onsite cardiac surgery available or not, makes a difference on participant outcomes. Current standard of care is to have this procedure done in a hospital with onsite cardiac surgery available. Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that the TAVR in experienced interventional cardiac centers without on-site cardiac surgery will be safe and effective. Although this is happening clinically in select regions internationally, this change in the clinical application of TAVI requires a rigorous assessment of safety with a robust randomized trial and multicenter international collaboration.
Primary Objectives: The primary efficacy objective is to determine whether a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedure performed by experienced operators in centers without on-site cardiac surgery is non-inferior to a TAVI procedure performed by experienced operators in centers with on-site cardiac surgery in terms of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure. The primary safety objective is to demonstrate that mortality associated with periprocedural complications actionable by emergent cardiac surgery (ECS) did not differ between study arms. Research method/Procedures ATLAS is an all-comer, prospective, randomized, multicenter, open label trial with blinded adjudicated evaluation of outcomes. The ATLAS study will involve centers without on-site cardiac surgery, but with experienced operators already performing TAVI. Participants will be recruited after Heart Team discussion and approval for TAVI. The eligibility of each participant will be confirmed by an established multidisciplinary Heart Team. Once approved for TAVI, dedicated review of the ATLAS study inclusion and exclusion criteria will occur. Study patients meeting inclusion and having no exclusion criteria will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to TAVI performed in the experimental or standard of care arm stratified by two groups: 1) inoperable/high risk and 2) intermediate/low risk. Randomization: EXPERIMENTAL ARM: TAVI WITHOUT ON-SITE SURGERY After randomization, the participant will be scheduled to undergo TAVI by experienced operators with appropriately trained cardiac catheterization staff. CONTROL ARM: TAVI WITH ON-SITE SURGERY After randomization, the patient will be scheduled to undergo TAVI by experienced operators with appropriately trained cardiac catheterization staff at an established TAVI center with on-site cardiac surgery Schedule of events: 1\. Pre-eligibility screening 2. Inclusion/Exclusion criteria review 3. Randomization 4. 1-month post randomization 5. 3-months post randomization 6. TAVI procedure hospitalization 7. 1-month visit after TAVI 8. 12-month visit after TAVI 9. Final follow-up visit - 12-month post TAVI in control arm and equivalent median time post randomization in the intervention arm
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
600
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) with surgical oversight
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) without surgical oversight
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Mazankowski Heart Insitute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Occurrence of an Emergent CardiacSurgery (ECS) event: Ventricular
Primary Safety Outcome: Occurrence of an ECS event: Ventricular Valve Embolization, Aortic Annular Rupture, Ventricular Perforation requiring ECS or Ascending Aortic Dissection requiring ECS. Composite Endpoint of Primary Efficacy and Safety (Net clinical benefit) Multiple measurement will result in an outcome of ECS (Emergent Cardiac Surgery).
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Death
Primary Efficacy Outcome: Composite of All Cause death from randomization.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Myocardial Infarction
Primary Efficacy Outcome: Composite of All Cause myocardial infarction (MI) from randomization.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Stroke
Primary Efficacy Outcome: Composite of All Cause Stroke, from randomization.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Heart Failure Hospitalization
Primary Efficacy Outcome: Composite of All Cause Heart Failure Hospitalization from randomization.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Individual components of primary efficacy outcome
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Individual components of primary efficacy outcome
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Hospitalization for cardiovascular cause
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Hospitalization for cardiovascular cause
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Permanent Pace Maker (PPM)
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Need for Permanent Pace Maker (PPM) during study period
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Urgent percutaneous coronary revascularization
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Need for urgent percutaneous coronary revascularization
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Acute kidney injury
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Procedural wait time
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Procedural wait time from randomization to implantation date
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Length of hospital stay
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Length of hospital stay (specific to TAVI implantation) hospitalization)
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Total days of hospitalization
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Total days of hospitalization from randomization to end of study follow up
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Health economics analysis- Adverse Events
Monitoring and analyzing of adverse events (AEs) weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2).
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Health economics analysis- Long-term Outcomes
Evaluation of the long-term effects of interventions on health and economic outcomes.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Health economics analysis- Healthcare Resource Utilization
Evaluation of the use of healthcare services, such as hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and medication usage.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Health economics analysis- Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs
direct reports from patients about their health condition and treatment effects.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Quality of Life
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Quality of Life Baseline, 90 days post randomization, one year post randomization measured with Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Emergent balloon aortic valvuloplasty
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Need for emergent balloon aortic valvuloplasty prior to TAVI implantation required because of patent deterioration or emergent
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Major Bleeding
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Major (type 2-4) bleeding (VARC). Multiple measurement to determine type of bleed.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Minor Bleeding
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Minor (type 1) bleeding (VARC). Multiple measurement to determine type of bleed.
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
Secondary Efficacy Outcomes
Secondary Efficacy Outcome: Major vascular complication (VARC) -Major or Minor vascular com Multiple measure to determine the vascular complications outcomes
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of 90 day follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.