Comparison of Pain Relief Methods for Hip Surgery: A Study on Two Different Nerve Block Techniques

Overview

This prospective randomized comparative study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESP) groups to relieve postoperative pain in participants over the age of 18 undergoing total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. The main question it aims to answer is: To demonstrate whether PENG block or L-ESP block is more effective in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty surgery based on pain scores, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction. Total hip arthroplasties cause severe pain with movement in the postoperative period. After surgery, the movements of the participants are severely restricted, which increases the possibility of complications. In this study, the participants' pain status, VAS score, opioid consumption through patient-controlled analgesia, and patient satisfaction will be measured with a questionnaire for 24 hours at predetermined time points and then compared. Both types of blocks have pain-relieving effects. This study will only investigate which one is more effective in reducing pain, and there will be no deficiency in relieving the pain of the participants.

Due to increasing life expectancy and the prevalence of obesity, hip arthroplasty surgeries have been steadily increasing, especially in the last twenty years, and these patients experience very serious postoperative pain. Postoperative pain control has a significant impact on earlier ambulation, initiation of physical therapy, better functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. At the same time, optimal pain management is of great importance in contributing to the reduction of the duration of hospital stay, the risk of adverse events such as deep vein thrombosis, and mortality. Although peripheral nerve blocks have been shown to be effective as part of multimodal analgesia for successful postoperative pain management, the superiority of nerve blocks over each other in terms of analgesic efficacy is a subject of research. This study was planned to show which of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block and Lumbar Erector Spina Plane Block to be applied to patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty is more effective in terms of postoperative effective analgesia duration, perioperative hemodynamic stability, reducing opioid dependence and postoperative delirium, reducing total opioid consumption, providing early mobilization and shortening the length of hospital stay. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a promising regional analgesia procedure that protects the motor function of the hip joint by blocking the obturator nerve, femoral nerve and accessory obturator nerves by injecting local anesthetic between the superior pubic ramus and psoas muscle tendon. Erector spina plane block (ESPB) has been widely used at the thoracic vertebral level in 2016 with ultrasound-guided local anesthetic injection between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process of the thoracic vertebra. In a single case study published in 2018, lumbar ESPB (L-ESPB) was used as postoperative analgesia after hip arthroplasty, and the local anesthetic injected from the fourth lumbar spine level (L4) spread to the cephalic and caudal directions and provided satisfactory hip analgesia. Since both blocks are relatively newly defined blocks, there are limited studies in the literature and it is aimed to find an answer to the question of which of these two block types should be preferred by evaluating different parameters in providing postoperative analgesia in hip arthroplasty surgery. Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) (Group P) or Lumbar Erector Spina Plane Block (Group E) will be applied preoperatively to patients hospitalized in the orthopedics and traumatology clinic who come to the operating room to undergo Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery, after the necessary information is provided and monitoring is provided before being taken to the operation with spinal anesthesia. Randomization will be done 1:1 with a computer (using http://www.randomizer.org). Spinal anesthesia will be applied to patients who have preoperative block. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) will be applied to all patients to evaluate opioid consumption at the end of the surgery. The patient's total opioid consumption will be recorded. Pain is a symptom known to be subjective and will be questioned with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), a standardized scale, in order to minimize differences between patients. At predetermined time points, Baseline 0, peroperative 15th minute, 1st hour, 2nd hour and postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th hours, the patients' pain scores with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10; 0-3: mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: severe pain) will be questioned and noted. When the pain score is 4 and above, 20 mg tenoxicam will be administered as rescue analgesia and the total amount required will be recorded. In both groups, patients' demographic data, ASA scores, surgery duration, hemodynamic parameters during the operation (systolic, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate and SpO2 values), the time when the pain sensation started after the operation, the block termination process in the service follow-ups, the time when the additional analgesics was first needed, the dose administered, the numerical rating scale when the patient was asked to describe the pain intensity numerically, patient satisfaction scores (4: very satisfied, 3: satisfied, 2: less satisfied, 1: not satisfied), hospital stay, nausea-vomiting score and other complications related to the applied blocks will be recorded and followed for the first 24 hours.